Wolf_ODonnell wrote:I myself don't believe the media does have a political bias, only a bias towards sensationalism.
One of the things I've often wondered is, "Is this perceived bias a result of the media being biased, or the media kow-towing to a biased audience?" I myself think that the media only seems biased, because the audience itself is biased.
It makes more sense for the media to cater its news to its audience and thus make more money, than it does to cater towards either wing of the political spectrum.
A couple of points in response
1) Many, if not most, individual journalists believe they have a calling rather than a job. They feel it is their sacred duty to present the
truth to the American people. Unfortunately they don't believe that the American people can appreciate the truth without their putting the proper spin on it.
The simple fact of the matter is that an overwhelming majority of journalists describe themselves as liberals. Certainly it doesn't unerringly follow that one's personal opinions would influence one's professional judgments, but hey, we're talking about people, not sages or saints.
Interestingly, the Left seems to find it impossible that a Supreme Court Justice can seperate his or her personal beliefs from their professional judgments, but they have no problem in accepting that journalists can.
2) If the audience is so biased and the media companies are so hell bent on making money off these audiences, doesn't it follow that they would present biased news as a business strategy? Who are the right and left wings of the political spectrum if not members of the biased audience?
Here again, the Left doesn't seem to have any trouble identifying the only areas of news and entertainment where bias is actually reflected: Fox News and Rush Limbaugh's radio show, but can't detect a whif of it in such stalwart sources as The NY Times, The LA Times, ABC and CBS news, Newsweek, The Boston Globe etc etc etc.