Indian Diary of other not-so-smart travellers

And lets hope for all our sakes he stays there.

well I'm sorry I didnt discover this thread earlier, because Brahmin is clearly an intelligent lad, and I'm sure would be most friendly, providing you are of the right caste, religion, race, colour and nation.

well for anyone who missed the last few illuminating pages, but mainly for my own entertainment

I said

You can get violent extremism and intolerance associated with most religions, Hinduism included as I suspect you well know.

Brahmin replied

nope.

one broken mosque (which initself is built after razing a temple) and one riot...is NOT equal to crusades, inquisition, witch burning, genocides of natives in 2.5 continents, pogroms, holocausts, latin american cathocalypse....

learn to carry your cross (excuse the pun).

(not that hes got anything against christians of course)

which places us right up there with those who carry out genocides, pogroms, crusades, butcherings, inquisitions, wholescale looting of natural resources (aka colonialism), holocausts, with those who justify slave owning in southern usa with choice quotes from the bible..... ???????!!!

bleh just bleh !!!

(so there is it, you heard it from the holy cows mouth, Hindutva violence amounted to a broken mosque.)

you guys dont know math - thats the problem.

for example,

6 million/ 3 (taking graham staines' case) = 2 million.


thats the factor - 2 million, by which you guys out do us at butchery !



besides, i thought i had already acknowledged the miniscule number of pitfalls on our part.

(thats that broken window again)

Then Brahmin (for reasons best known to himself) goes off on one about English extermination of the Jews:-

the english accuse the palmach/irgun of blowing up the king david hotel in israel and killing maybe a dozen poms - while they never ever admit that they denied entry to a million fleeing european jews ...so the english actually helped the holocaust happen, by doing their bit.

But not to be outdone, yes you've guessed it, the Hindus were massacred in larger number (but by Muslims this time)

I said " We had at maximum 250,000 "colonialists",

yes. thats why gandhi was an imbecile.

he failed to see that india was just one Den Bien Phu style war away from
getting freedom from england.

(here Brahmin regrets that Indian independence was not achieved by the slaughter of the British and not through Gandhi's peaceful methods)

I pointed out


"We were against Hitler and the nazis, many Inidans supported them I seem to recall"


yes. i dont mind indians going after nazis but indians dying in europe in ww1 and 2 to save the very english who hammered us !!!?? thats just rediculous.

we should have attacked the brits in india, during ww1, when they were already stretched, and gotten out independence in 1915-ish instead of waiting till the ww2 took the wind out of the raj.

and if you do mind indians not having saved as many english lives from germans as we could have, then we could not care less.

(about now he really gets into some sort of delerium)

you tried to allege that we sided with nazis. -- "
you tried to defend deindustrialization. ----couldnt.
-------------------- introduction of english. ----""
-------------------- the sandwiching of jews. ---""
------------- defend colonization with rail, telegraph etc. -- couldnt (long before you, the raj tried to prolong their stay with rail, telegraph.. and COULDNT)

everything was spoilt for a good 100 years or so, by the time you left after looting india hollow

it matters jack what you think of a billion strong country. you aint the buddha !!

the blood of a couple billion is in your hands
you come the sort of spineless scavenger people
poms never are !!

even germany bowed her head in shame for their nazi days... but poms never learn.

poms !

(the british empire) was a nazi-style misery-machine and a spineless thing.

But, I said gently, "we did not treat people like Leopold did in the Congo"

to no avail...

you treated them worse !!!

the 6 million who died in bengal thanks to your dads.

japs (b4 ww2) are like a dream compared to poms.

taking slavery to dizzy heights and squeeziung every last drop out of it.

who the hell asked you to begin it eh ??

poms are the most uncivilised people on the planet.

speaking of nazi, the poms also did their bit to sandwich the jews - cos the poms didnt care about nazism and its dangers as long as their colonies were left untouched. so what if a few million jews die after we sandwich them !!

poms deserve a dose of their own medicine as do beligians and dutch. the jews deserved no stick. but for ww2, 90% of the colonies would still have been under the scavengers.

for every pom that died, on the other hand, some or the other native's death was avenged.

russia had not intervened, then a lot more poms would have died (much to our glee). too bad germany could not get her priorities right - they should have left the innocent jews well alone and fried poms instead.


so rip.

which prompted me to say

"You know its excitable chaps like you who go a long way to re establish national and racial stereotypes which most of us have long since left behind."

but (I should have guessed) Brahmin said

i am not exitable.

i answered everything levelheadedly.

and tell me how is the wholescale colonisation that your forefathers did and off which pomland still lives of, any lesser than the stick you got from germans during ww2 ?? serves you right.

you resorted to name calling cos i exposed you and your scavenger ilk and showed how you guys are no better than nazis, no better than leoplod, (I do like that name, Leoplod, first policeman of the Belgian Congo Smile)

oh dear he's at it again

so say your prayers and count your days.


so again, rip !!

poms !!

have used "n" number of exclaimations and questionmarks.. like i do again here to eneble you to figure out my psychological makeup some more...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I asked another participant
"are you another hindutva-nazi..."

and guess what, Brahmin thought I was talking about him, and replied


lmao pom !!!

you couldn't hold a candle against the evidence i presented that disrobed your criminal forefathers !!!

and so now i am a hindu-nazi... when nazi is precisely what your scavenger dads

the secondary semetic idelogical blood brothers are the bane of india's existance. and if these two murderous cults ever joined the dodo someday, it'd be tough to find a happier person than me.

dont see how poms are any less nazi.

as ever i get it absolutely right.

thou art the progeny of bloodthirsty cut throats.

to a third party I explained the meaning of the word pom

" It should be pohm, and no one takes offense at it anyway, although he means to be offensive."

to which Brahmin replied


sure i do.

you deserve that, your entire scavenger ilk of poms deserves that

you are just a spineless bad loser, and the epitome of a pom.

so rip.

all done your your ilk .



yours is the scum of the earth.. and the most spineless too!!!


even germans have owned up their crimes... but poms keep denying theirs !!

scum !!!!!

spineless liar !!!! (my first personal attack.... there's only so many lies a person can take)

(thats a good one dont you think, my first personal attack...Smile)

pom!!

we wont forget, let alone forgive your beggar ilk that came to loot our country hollow.


so rip and dont answer back.

By this time I had to confess to our Hindutva-not-really-Nazi that his worked up spittle flecked posts only caused amusement

to which we got the instant answer


i am not worked up.
................................................................
Whose responses are always judicious and thoughtful, ever mindful not to cause offense.

Brahmin, disagreements, and putting yr point of view across can be done without insulting other people or calling them names.

Brahmin, disagreements, and putting yr point of view across can be done without insulting other people or calling them names.

On another thread Brahmin you advocated killing people. You regret that Indian independence was not achieved through slaughtering all the Brits. You call me a spineless pom, but your posts speak volumes about your true character. You must know that you are on the brink of getting banned from a2k, moderate your language or you will be.

i lost my cool somewhat.

brahmin wrote:

i lost my cool somewhat.

You sure did brahmin. Now I am going to resist the temptation of quoting back to you the various names and insults you have hurled at me, because as I think you might just be learning, there is no future in that.

So I will return to the point that divided us. You contend that the relative de-industrialisation of India was entirely down to British colonial rule. I said Britain also introduced many aspects of "high technology" of the day eg. the railway and telegraph systems, besides introducing the English language and our system of law. My general point was that whilst colonialism per se is hard to defend, there were aspects of British rule that benefitted India.

Moreover in the Harvard reference you yourself supplied, on the particular issue of Indian de-industrialisation, the authors make it clear that in their opinion there was a deeper underlying cause of it (whilst not discounting the effect of abolishing import duties), and that was the relative decline of the Murghal empire.

Now I was going to say that if you wish to continue this discussion in a sensible and reasonable way without resort to personal invective, then I would be pleased to read what you have to say. But sadly I dont think you are capable of doing that, and therefore as far as I am concerned, this issue is closed.