Slappy Doo Hoo wrote:The whole cultural significance of marriage doesn't convince me...gay couples have been long/life relationships for years. And I'm not religious, so I could care less about that aspect. Committment comes from the two people's effort in the relationship, not a $10,000 ring the male has to buy and a legal contract.
I think you misunderstood what I meant by "cultural significance".
I wasn't saying that you should let society control your relationship, and I wasn't making any kind of religious statement. I agree completely that commitment comes from the effort of the people in the relationship.
There are cultural symbols in our culture that are a part of who we are. Some are a part of our general culture. Some are from our upbringing or passed down through are familiy. These symbols can be religious or not, but they are important. They are individual symbols that are often also shared (and that is part of their importance).
Each couple gets to pick which of these symbols to use, and what the significance of them are.
If you are paying attention, you will know I am a strong proponent of homosexual marriage. Some couples went through marriage ceremonies even before they were legally sanctioned here. They did this because of these cultural symbols that are important.
I didn't buy my wife a $10,000 ring. We have a pair of not very expsensive gold bands that are very important to us as symbols of our bond.
When a couple is married, they alone are responsible for the meaning of the marriage and the nature of the relationship.
But the cultural symbols that are part of our society are there, be it rings, or breaking a glass, or prayer, or dancing. They have value not as rules that must be followed, but as a rich cultural heritage that can be chosen and used as part of a meaningful marriage.