4
   

Should it be "was" instead?

 
 
Reply Sun 27 Nov, 2022 08:15 pm
He assured them that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) were on the case.

Should it be "was" instead of "were"?

Thanks.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 4 • Views: 274 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Nov, 2022 09:41 pm
Depends on where you live. The UK say one way and North America says another, depending on whether they see the unit (police force, PTA, etc) as a single or plural entity. I don't think it really matters; unless you're doing an English Grammar exam, no one's going to be fussed about it.
0 Replies
 
steve reid
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2022 01:43 am
@tanguatlay,
tanguatlay wrote:

He assured them that the Singapore Police Force (SPF) were on the case.

Should it be "was" instead of "were"?

Thanks.

No

"Singapore Police Force (SPF)" is plural, and so "were" is correct.

If you changed "Singapore Police Force (SPF)" to "Singapore Policeman" then "was" would be correct, because "Singapore Policeman" is singular.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2022 01:53 am
@steve reid,
Yes - if you are British. No - if you are American.
steve reid
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2022 03:19 am
@roger,
Thank you for setting the record straight, I sometimes forget I'm on the world stage here Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Dec, 2022 03:40 am
@roger,
Singapore, and the OP, uses standard, not American English.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Should it be "was" instead?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 02:48:48