1
   

AOL, MSN seize spam assets

 
 
Reply Wed 10 Aug, 2005 09:07 am
AOL, MSN seize spam assets

By Jon Swartz, USA TODAY

America Online and Microsoft are hitting spammers where it hurts most: They are confiscating their assets and giving them away.


AOL, the world's largest Internet service provider, is awarding $20,000 in gold bars, a 2003 Hummer H2 and $75,000 in cash it seized from a major spammer as part of a legal settlement last year. It will hold a sweepstakes on its Web site starting Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Microsoft on Tuesday said Scott Richter, once considered one of the world's top spammers, and his company, OptInRealBig.com, agreed to pay $7 million under a legal settlement. Microsoft is donating $1 million to a New York program to provide computer gear to community centers. It will spend $5 million more on anti-spam efforts.

"We think it's justice," says Curtis Lu, AOL deputy general counsel. "We're taking the ill-gotten bounty these spammers have earned off the backs of our customers and handing it back to customers."

The unusual actions illustrate how far AOL and Microsoft are willing to go to discourage spammers, who for years have hounded popular Internet services with unwanted commercial e-mail, and to appease harried users. The largest spammers charge clients up to $50,000 a month to e-mail ads.

It is the second time AOL has given away assets accumulated by spammers. Last year, AOL awarded a $45,000 Porsche Boxster.

This year's drawing signifies the effectiveness of the federal Can-Spam Act, Lu says. AOL collected the gold, truck and cash after suing a spammer under the stricter law last year. The lawsuit was one of a dozen AOL filed since the law went into effect Jan. 1, 2004. It "has struck fear into spammers," Lu says.

The flurry of recent lawsuits has made an appreciable dent in the spam pouring into AOL's and Microsoft's online services, the companies say. Spam is down 85% at AOL, based on member complaints.

Still, spam remains a thorny issue for U.S. consumers and businesses despite high-profile legislation and lawsuits. About 72% of e-mail is spam, up from 68% a year ago, says IronPort Systems, an e-mail security vendor. It says many spammers are shifting targets, from AOL and MSN to businesses and broadband users with less security and fewer legal resources.

Some spammers are adding viruses to steal personal data, computer-security experts say.

"We shouldn't declare victory, but we are turning the tide," says Brad Smith, Microsoft general counsel.

Steve Richter, Scott's father and attorney, said his son has agreed to comply with the federal anti-spam law, and his company is "making every effort to be a model for the best Internet marketing practices."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 614 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 03:55 am
Hip hip hooray
0 Replies
 
bobsmythhawk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Aug, 2005 03:03 pm
I'm sure they did it just to make you happy, Joe. Well, maybe one or two others.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Aug, 2005 05:05 am
Spam is our own fault. I wish I could remember the first spam I received, was it for free porn? I can't remember. I do remember being resigned to the fact that this internet thing was going to be paid for somehow and that marketing would be a large part of that. I did mistakenly think that email spam would be a small part of it, (I thought it would be seen as too invasive to be in a mailbox, Haha on me) that the bulk of marketing would be in ads or banners or inserts on webpages. Today, just like everyone else, I get forty to sixty spams, medical make your whoha bigger spam, drug-we've got it you get it spam, singles love connection spam, letter from the very ernest Nigerian Ambassador spam and, of course, free porn free porn free porn spam. Who ever responds to any of these? There must be somebody responding or the money would dry up.

I've gotten very good at deleting and blocking. On my real mailbox, I block senders so I never get anything from them again. I've blocked a few relatives who could not get it through their skulls that those "Watch out for car without headlights" emails were spoofs and a few who insisted on sending my email address attached to seventy-two others out on the joke of the day. On my fakey mailbox, I know you have one, I just hit the delete button twenty -seven times.

It's a small bother to me but now spam is seventy percent of email, christ what a waste of resources, but then I think how much would you pay not to have any ads at all. $100. a month? $125.00 Hey, I can delete.

Joe( see related note)Nation

On a related note: I have recently been put on somebody's financial chain letter mailing list. Everyday, or nearly every day, I get a letter, a real letter in my US postal mailbox, urging me to make 200 copies and send them out and wait for the money to roll in. It's a throwback to the bygone days of yesteryear. It makes me a little nostalgic and I always have a little regret when I bundle them up and send them to the US Postmaster.

JN
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

YouTube Is Doomed - Discussion by Shapeless
So I just joined Facebook.... - Discussion by DrewDad
Internet disinformation overload - Discussion by rosborne979
Participatory Democracy Online - Discussion by wandeljw
OpenDNS and net neutrality - Question by Butrflynet
Internet Explorer 8? - Question by Pitter
 
  1. Forums
  2. » AOL, MSN seize spam assets
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 06:57:01