0
   

A "Wood Between the Worlds" Digression....

 
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 11:29 am
<Yawwwn>

Gad! Is it Easter alreadY? I know I've been sleepin' a lot but. . .

Well, good egg roll, everyone.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 11:40 am
Oh, foll du roll...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 02:45 pm
Osso's on fire!!!!

My god, that cookie thing is enough to kill a thousand diabetics! It's almost pure flavoured sugar!

Would be like drowning in jelly....

COULD one drown in jelly? If it were set, I mean...


Hey - DEBACLE'S here!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 02:54 pm
Now why the Hell would i be any more likely to drown in jelly than anyone else . . . yer just a bully, that's all . . .
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 02:57 pm
You're a D-O-G Set, not a G-O-D!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 02:59 pm
Same letters, one's just a mirror image of the other . . . and you didn't answer my question . . .
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:02 pm
Yer not - as far as I know - an "it" - and I believe you have a capital "s".

Yer gonna hafta ask a sensible question before I can answer.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:03 pm
Oh, Miss Smartypants Wabbit . . . did Dog die and leave you in charge? Howzcome you get to decide what's sensible and what ain't?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:06 pm
Why shouldn't I?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:06 pm
Because

You're

A


WABBIT ! ! !
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:12 pm
So - you have prejudice against Wabbits, then?


I seeeeeeeeeeeeeee.......
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 03:13 pm
Everyone knows wabbits rank just below cats and toads in the scale of any-mule excellence . . . sheesh . . .
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Aug, 2005 09:40 pm
Is sensible-ness - or even sensibility - a requirement or a preclusion for this here thread-thingy?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 03:24 am
Not even sensitivity, Margo.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 07:16 am
Both sense and sensitivity are required, but must be managed so subtly as not to be clunkily evident.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 08:26 am
From a night of more sleep than she had expected, Marianne awoke the next morning to the same consciousness of misery in which she had closed her eyes.

My second favorite line from Sense and Sensibility . . .
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 03:30 pm
Aha - a Janeite!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Aug, 2005 03:33 pm
My all-time fay-voh-rite passsage form S & S:

The dinner was a grand one, the servants were numerous, and everything bespoke the mistress's inclination for show and the master's ability to support it....no poverty of any kind, except of conversation, appeared, but there the deficiency was considerable. John Dashwood had not much to say for himself that was worth hearing, and his wife had still less. But there was no peculiar disgrace in this, for it was very much the case with the chief of their visitors, who almost all laboured under one or other of these disqualifications for being agreeable: want of sense, either natural or improved; want of elegance, want of spirits, or want of temper.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 01:43:55