My friend htam9876 has asked to open this thread:

Nobel Prize in physics, touchy and feely

Piggy got the information Nobel Prize in physics 2022 announced yesterday on web. Congratulations to those three scientists.

No doubt Mr. Nobel was a great man in the history of science, “shining like sun ray”.

But seems Nobel Prize in physics has an obscure defect: it’s said that Nobel Prize in physics ever favors experiment, while never honor “pure theory”…
Honestly speaking, actually theory is a big part of physics. Piggy really has no idea what’s “pure theory”. Physics is that thing of “theory and experiment woven together”. Any experiment needs theory to explain. Correct theory can help instruct experiment.
Successful and excellent experiments are just scattering discoveries, just like the glaring stars in the night sky. They help human’s cognition about nature in a real way.
But if people want an overall cognition about nature, they need a theoretical system.
That means the job of unification of physics might go beyond the category of Nobel?

Moreover, Nobel Prize in physics is an award of achievement.
For a soldier in the battle field, a bottle of water might be very important. Perhaps one day, they can survive and win out and get a piece of medal from the King, “shining like sun ray”.

Amen.

Piggy did a bit revision and supplement to the post yesterday in the philosophy forum and put it here for reference.

“Capital punishment” vs science, touchy and feely

Why can’t humans solve the problems facing mankind?
Piggy’s answer was very explicit, absolutely very loud: Perhaps, Lord is AWARE he created something wrong at last…he has no idea how to sympathize with / have compassion for them.
Perhaps “capital punishment” is a favorite of human being. People must try every means to terminate the conflicting counterpart in battle field.

Next, piggy says something with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig:
In these special days of Nobel Prize in physics 2022, some guys again take the chance and pull out the “hard” problem of the incompatibility between Relativity and QM to hassle Einstein. Actually this “hard” problem in science has been solved by piggy. They just reflect / describe different aspects of the elephant, which can be INTERCONNECTED / unified in the pig’s physics model. They are both reasonable. There is no such problem as whether Einstein must defeat QM or QM must defeat Einstein in nature. It’s just a problem facing mankind which can’t be solved by human.
Actually, many “hard problems” in science have been solved IN ONE WAY here in this galaxy. However, perhaps those “authentic” guys occupied over 99 percent of the “scientific” territory will argue with their “loudness” even after hundreds of years. They are “heavy accumulated and hard to go back 积重难返”.

Piggy hereby repeats relevant materials for reference to those guys who are willing to touch the elephant in an alternative angle:
The chapter “The first fundamental natural system vs the second fundamental natural system 2, touchy and feely” in the thread “T vs R”.

The presentation / appearance of relative (constant velocity) movement in the second fundamental natural system is Einstein’s SR.
The presentation / appearance of relative (constant velocity) movement in the first fundamental natural system is the root of Einstein’s SR:
“Actually, the physical essence of the relativistic principles is the inherent property of spherical electromagnetic wave (simplified physical model as the “circle kind standing wave”). Summarized briefly as below:
In dynamic situation, the kinematic energy appears and then the internal energy increases; according to the energy – mass equation, the mass increases; according to the mass – space equation, the radium or circumference would contract; and then the wavelength decreases; and then the frequency would increase (time inflates).”
Supplement: such “increase”, “decrease”, “contract” or “inflate” is constant.

The presentation / appearance of relative accelerated movement or gravity in the second fundamental natural system is “space – time curvature” described by Einstein’s GR.
The presentation / appearance of relative accelerated movement or gravity in the first fundamental natural system is:
“Also the inherent property of spherical electromagnetic wave (simplified physical model as the “circle kind standing wave”). Summarized briefly as below:
In dynamic situation, the kinematic energy appears and then the internal energy increases; according to the energy – mass equation, the mass increases; according to the mass – space equation, the radium or circumference would contract; and then the wavelength decreases; and then the frequency would increase (time inflates).”
Supplement: such “increase”, “decrease”, “contract” or “inflate” is variable.

Piggy’s physics model has another additonal inherent property: the spiral chilarity. (For details, please see the thread “matter vs anti - matter”).
In piggy’s theory, the electric interaction is directly reflected by the spiral chilarity of spherical electromagnetic wave (simplified physical model as the “circle kind standing wave”). No matter move or not, such spiral chilarity exists.

Those smart researchers who are willing to advance to higher dimension should be able to find that such inherent property has two presentation / appearance.
Namely: Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P and Ψ(R ) = (1/ R）sinR p
Only 4D space math can demonstrate / describe the subtle difference. (Many people wonder why it’s called “electromagnetic force”? The answer might be here. Not the topic at present.) The upper letter “P” represents 4D space momentum, while the lower letter “p” represents 3D space momentum. P = X4p.
When v = 0, 3D space momentum p = 0, 4D space momentum P = 0 too.. Then, Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P = 0. That means the wave characteristics of electric interaction disappear. Namely, the wave characteristics of electric interaction is the effect of moving charge (s). But it doesn’t mean electric interaction would disappear when charges don’t move, because as piggy said ahead: “in piggy’s theory, the electric interaction is directly reflected by the spiral chilarity of spherical electromagnetic wave…”
When v = 0, 3D space momentum p = 0, then, Ψ(R ) = (1/ R）sinR p = 0. The fact is static charges would not generate magnetism in classical electromagnetism. Coincidence again?

And in piggy’s theory, QM should be the science to research the wave characteristics of electric interaction.

Perhaps, relative movement, gravity, electromagnetic interaction, QM can be INTERCONNECTED through the pig’s physics model.

As well as
A section of “unit charge model” in the thread “matter vs anti matter”:
A special situation in GR (without gravity) is SR. How about electric interaction? When electric interaction disappears, it’s a free particle. An ideal situation of this is the infinite distance. We can see that the amplitude 1 / r of the wave function Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P in the X4 unit charge model trends to zero when distance r trends to infinite. Actually the wave function will no longer meaningful. How to maintain the uniform of representation in math? We can assume the amplitude of the wave function is a constant A and it means the situation of without electric interaction. That’s the wave function for free particle.

And
The chapter “X4 Explanation of Double Slits Experiment for Electron” in the thread “matter vs anti matter”.

Because the wave function for free particle is just a mathematical form while the physical meaning of wave already lost, the application of it to explain the generation of interference pattern in the double slits experiment of electron is inappropriate (e.g. “all possible paths, interference with itself, etc”).
An alternative method to explain it is as below:
Actually the electron moves in electric field in the apparatus.
The electron passes through either one of the slits. No matter which slit the electron passes through, the wave characteristic of electric interaction will cause interference information in the slits.
When electro - magnetic detector(s) fixed to observe, those interference information created in the slits will be disturbed by the physical interaction between electron and detector(s), and then the interference pattern will disappear.
The principle is also applicable to explain the diffraction pattern in the single slit experiment for electron.

And
The chapter “The physical mechanism of the generation of probability by the wave characteristic of electric interaction” in the thread “matter vs anti matter”:
No matter in the single slit or double slits experiment of electron, on the diffraction pattern or the interference pattern, the areas of bright strips means electric interaction exists while the areas of dark strips means electric interaction does not exist.
At this time, the electron presents its certain property in 3D physical space. According to the X4 physical model of elementary particle, it’s a tiny round ball.
The tiny round ball has to drop onto one of the areas of bright strips on the screen / film RANDOMLY. This is the first step of the generation of probability.
And then, the tiny round ball has to drop into one point of the area of bright strip chosen in the first step above RANDOMLY. This is the second step of the generation of probability.




A vivid analogy can be this:
When you are a young boy once upon a time, you possibly might have a few targets (beautiful ladies) in your mind. However, you had to choose only one at last. Thereafter, your trajectory of life became a certain one, until the coffin cover put onto the coffin box…Oh Lord…
Piggy suggests scientists do the single slit or double slits experiment of electron in cloud room. There is nothing “uncertain” in 3D space.

Actually the so called what “standard” MODEL means a “capital punishment” to science.
But it doesn’t mean they can claim a “capital punishment” to the elephant in nature. Positive minds are AWARE there might be an alternative angle to touch the elephant.

Man vs shadow, touchy and feely

Next, piggy goes on to say a bit more here with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig:

As piggy said once upon a time elsewhere: “Higher dimension is not to explain myth. It’s the need of scientific research”, “The ability of DESCRIPTION of 3D space + time is very limited”, etc. That’s why the X4 factor (the fourth spacial dimension) need to PRESENCE in this world.

In classical electromagnetism, we feel electrical PHENOMENON and magnetic PHENOMENON are just like man and his shadow. Now in meta physics level, we dig their root.

These two equations of Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P and Ψ(R ) = (1/ R）sinRp are like man and his shadow too. The question is which one is “man” and which one is “shadow”? We need to see the INTERCONNECTION with classical electromagnetism. As Mr. pmb said in PHF once upon a time: “The amplitude matters in wave function… ”. We notice the amplitude （1/r）is a factor in the electric force F = KQq / r² in “standard” classical electromagnetism. So, this is a check point of the ongoing research and we can primarily assume the equation Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P represents electricity.

Below are some stuffs in the chapters of “Unilateral conception of field vs bilateral conception of field” series in the thread “T vs R (2)”. Piggy reorganized the materials and repeats them here for reference.
Set out from the magnitude of electric force F = KQq / r² in “standard” classical electromagnetism.
The intensity of electric field E = KQ / r²

In piggy’s unit charge model, the “wave function distribution field” of a charged particle can be represented by the equation: Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P. The amplitude of wave function naturally means the intensity of electric field E.
So, the equation for the intensity of electric field for any charge could be E = KQ / r.

A bit different? What happens? Those negative minds would argue over who’s right who’s wrong endless only with their loudness. Haha. They can’t discover new things and win anything in science. Never.

Next we transform the equation F = KQq / r² in math.
Let K = K1 K2
Then the electric force formula can be transformed as F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r)

At this moment, smart researchers with positive mind who are sensitive in physics would be AWARE of this point: there might be two conceptions for the intensity of electric field.
So, we initiate the unilateral conception of field E = KQ / r² as well as the bilateral conception of field E = K1Q / r or E = K2q / r.

In unilateral conception of field: F = (KQ / r²) × q
It means field deal with particle.

In bilateral conception of field: F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r) = E1 × E2
It means field deal with field.

Piggy supposes in unilateral conception of field, the electric constant should be denoted with upper letter K, while in bilateral conception of field, the electric constant should be denoted with lower letter k. K = k².

Then, in unilateral conception of field, electric force F = (KQ / r²) × q;

Then, in bilateral conception of field, electric force F = (K1Q / r) × (K2q / r) = (kQ / r) × (kq / r)

In unilateral conception of field, intensity of electric field E = KQ / r²
In bilateral conception of field, intensity of electric field E = kQ / r or E = kq / r

Now, we see the consistency of Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P and the electricity in classical electromagnetism.
So, we can confirm the equation Ψ(P ) =（1/r）sinr P represents electricity.
Then, the other one Ψ(R ) = (1/ R）sinRp represents magnetism.

At this moment, piggy repeats: As Mr. pmb said in PHF once upon a time: “The amplitude matters in wave function… ”.
The upper letter “R” represents 4D space, while the lower letter “r” represents 3 D space.
R = X4 r.
Then, the amplitude “1/ R” is not the same as the amplitude “1/ r” in math;
Also, the amplitude “1/ R” is not the same as the amplitude “1/ r” in physics.

The fact is that the character of magnetism is a bit different from that of electricity in classical electromagnetism.

Coincidence again?
(Piggy hopes the pig can do more researches here in this respect in the appropriate time in the future.)

Amen.

Smart researchers with positive mind should be AWARE piggy has unified the traditional conception of four fundamental natural forces, Relativity and QM in one physics model.

Next, piggy did a bit supplement to some stuff in my thread “T vs R (2)” in the philosophy forum and repeats it here.

Entanglement of quantum, touchy and feely

Piggy says something here with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig.
Piggy can access very limited scientific resource in this respect. So, no detailed analysis can be delivered. (Piggy’s situation is getting worse and worse domestically. Piggy is afraid the pig will be constrained to be a dead man at any time.)

The typical type of entanglement of quantum should be “entanglement of photo - quantum”, because it’s talked mostly.

Yesterday piggy read an essay on the local web and noticed a section of that author’s comment: “Although scientists discovered the phenomenon of entanglement of quantum and can do some experiments, they not yet reached consensus on the mechanism…it even could go beyond the fundamental research on QM…”
Piggy agrees with his opinion very much. Perhaps only those “Lord of creature” can “sure enough” they hold the truth. 呵呵
What scientists can do actually is touchy and feely only and to provide some views and opinions.

Piggy has a bit humble opinion for reference too. Piggy always says the angle to touch the elephant is not sole / single one. Different angle different DESCRIPTION.

Some guys employed the word “instantaneous”, even the term “beyond space - time” to describe the effect of entanglement of quantum and are puzzled: “the upper limit of velocity of movement should be the speed of light c?”

Piggy feels they sneaked into the era of PRESENCE – PROPERTY again, while are not AWARE of it. The first case was Einstein’s energy – mass equation and relativistic kinematic equation. (For details, please see “Pig Head Award memorial 2”.)

Movement belongs to the second fundamental natural system, namely the PRESENCE – PRESENCE natural system. So is Einstein’s theory too, because it belongs to the category of Mass Point Dynamics. Then, the speed of light c became a constraint to his theory. (In GR, Einstein employed the method of Mass Point Dynamics to DESCRIBE the existence of gravity. But it doesn’t mean GR is gravity itself.) But people can’t say he is wrong. Any method of DESCRIPTION is limited ability.
The first fundamental natural system, namely the PRESENCE – PROPERTY natural system not yet entered the consciousness of those UNAWARE people. In this natural system, the “speed” of transmission of information should have nothing to do with movement and time. It’s the affair of “the mechanism of formation of matter”.
Piggy found that people nowadays are lack of the research and cognition in the first fundamental natural system. Such UNAWARE people occupied over 99 percent of the “scientific” territory and perhaps will be the “loudest” even after hundreds of years.

Relevant materials for reference:
Some chapters in the physics thread.
As well as the chapter “The first fundamental natural system vs the second fundamental natural system, touchy and feely” in the thread “T vs R”.

Next, rabbit PRESENCE again to show a vivid analogy:
Assume these two rabbits are a couple. Left A is a male rabbit, while right B a female one. They must entangle each other in their “lovely” lives.

Now if man has an idea to turn left A into a female rabbit, Lord will have to turn right B into a male one instantaneously.
It’s that simple in philosophy, if you are willing to touch the elephant in an alternative way.

Piggy never heard scientists can employ neutrino to do such experiment as “entanglement of neutrino”. Why?

Relevant stuffs for reference:
The chapter “photon vs anti photon” in the thread “matter vs anti – matter (2)”.

“…it even could go beyond the fundamental research on QM…”, touchy and feely

Analysis of Speed of Probability Wave:
The speed of probability wave of a free particle could be calculated as below:
If v is the moving speed of the particle, then, the speed of the corresponding probability wave:
u = γλ = (E/h)( h/P)
Since the frequency γ and wavelength λ of probability wave are meaningful in physics, their product, the wave speed u should be meaningful in physics too. The question here is what’s the physical meaning of the speed of probability wave? Meaningless actually? How lame it all sounds.

That just mean the traditional “authentic” QM is a freaky theory. (Once upon a time, we discussed the problem what’s the physical meaning of the speed of probability wave in PHF galaxy. No satisfactory answer.)

Moreover, the speed of probability wave u can be a limited value. Actually, the traditional “authentic” QM is also belongs to the category of Mass Point Dynamics. So, the speed of probability wave u would not exceed the speed of light c.
Rigorous analysis about speed of probability wave in math demonstrates the rule as below:
(v is the moving speed of the particle, u is the speed of the corresponding probability wave.)
When v → 0 , Lim u = 0,
When v → C, Lim u = C,
When 0 ＜ v ＜ C, v ＞u
(Piggy doesn’t know how to display the file here. It contains some complicated calculation in math. About two years ago, piggy attached the primary version of “analysis about speed of probability wave” in the thread “wavicle, an old topic” in the quantum column of PHF galaxy. )

As the author of that essay mentioned ahead said: “…it even could go beyond the fundamental research on QM…”

Next, piggy says a bit more here with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig:
The fun thing is if Mr. “Oscar” honored something really beyond those two base stones of modern physics. Where should theoretical physics go in the future? “toggle toggle inward outward blah blah bubble bubble” all day all night? Perhaps the First Order would advocate it. But piggy doesn’t think that normal scientists around the world would accept it. 呵呵

“…it even could go beyond the fundamental research on QM…” (2), touchy and feely


Scientists say entangling quantum can switch from one state to another. “Two states” can be an inspiring clue too.

Is it the principle of superposition of quantum states? No.
We know that in traditional “authentic” QM, quantum states can be countless:
Ψ = Ψ1 + Ψ2 + Ψ3 + Ψ4 + Ψ5 + Ψ6…

Piggy saw some guys wanted to use the concept of “Wavicle” in traditional “authentic” QM to explain “two states”. Piggy feels it’s inexplicit, doubtful, too complicated.
Rigorous analysis about speed of probability wave demonstrates the concept of wavicle in traditional “authentic” QM can’t establish always.
A question: what does the inconformity between moving speed of the particle v and the speed of the corresponding probability wave u in case of 0 ＜ v ＜ C mean exactly in physics? It represents a contradiction? It represents the wave state separating from the particle state? How lame it all sounds. It’s too abstract and not understandable. It just means the concept of wavicle in traditional “authentic” QM can’t establish in this case.
That just mean the traditional “authentic” QM is a freaky theory.

The fun thing is analysis in piggy’s physics model also can demonstrate the concept of wavicle can’t establish always.
In piggy’s “elementary particle – wave characteristic of electric interaction” model, wave is the wave characteristic of electric interaction, not a state of the particle itself. The “wave” and the “particle” are different independent things. (Note: Piggy thinks that piggy now has to abbreviate the long term of “the wave characteristic of electric interaction” as “electric wave”. Pay attention please, it’s not the well known “electro – magnetic wave” in classical electromagnetism.) There is no need for the speed of electric wave “u” to be in conformity with the moving speed of the particle “v”.
In piggy’s physics model, “both wave and particle are the characteristics of that thing” / “unification of contradiction” is applicable to the released photon (a section of electromagnetic wave travelling in straight line) only. But that’s “wave” (electromagnetic wave travelling in straight line) and “particle” (a section) are two aspects of the released photon. They are not “two states” can switch. Another fun thing would be “when v → C, Lim u = C” in analysis about speed of probability wave in the traditional “authentic” QM.

Very fun, seems piggy’s physics model and the concept of “electric wave” can be in perfect consistent with Mr. Duc de Broglie’s original idea of “γ = E/h, while λ = h/P”. Coincidence again?haha

(Relevant materials for reference: Pig Head Award 2021No. 4 position as well as unit charge model series chapters in the thread “matter vs anti matter.”)

As the author of that essay mentioned ahead said: “…it even could go beyond the fundamental research on QM…”

Next, piggy says a bit more here with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig:
The fun thing is if Mr. “Oscar” honored something really beyond those two base stones of modern physics. Where should theoretical physics go in the future? “toggle toggle inward outward blah blah bubble bubble” all day all night? Perhaps the First Order would advocate it. But piggy doesn’t think that normal scientists around the world would accept it. 呵呵


Liqiang Chen
Oct 17, 2022

I don’t think the CN government knows what I am. Everything has been covered up by my old classmates. And everyone knows I have nothing to do with politics.

I don’t think the Japanese and Kuomintang in ww2 would mound somebody like me.
But I am “sure enough” my old classmates would try to do it. No feeling of safety at all. Piggy is afraid the pig would disappear in this cosmos in any moment.

Perhaps the archaeologists in 22sec century would only find that the pig owed the mothers of the First Order very much. All would be the pig’s fault.

Piggy dies hard. Actually most of my time is spent on worrying about the safety and prospective of my family members.

In the 21st century around the world, the most complicated game would be the First Order’s game.
I can “assure” anyone on the Earth. 呵呵

给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代，全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵.

The physical meaning of the speed of probability wave is inexplicit as well as the concept of wavicle in traditional “authentic” QM can’t establish in case of 0 ＜ v ＜ C are two important reasons resulting in piggy given up the traditional conception of probability wave.

Now we have better choice.

Wonderful conformity, touchy and feely

Next, piggy goes on to say a bit more here with the lowest voice, as low as a dead pig:

The wonder is that when v → c, Lim u = c too. Conformity appears in this situation.
What does this conformity mean exactly in physics? It should be the concept of “wavicle” establishes in this situation.
Piggy’s physical model can explain it explicitly.
Piggy’s physical model for a released photon is “a section of electromagnetic wave travelling in straight line”, “a section” is from the angle of “particle” while “electromagnetic wave” is from the angle of “wave”. Of course v = u = c. Perfect conformity. Notice, at this moment, u changes to the speed of electromagnetic wave rather than the speed of the “electric wave”. And it’s known that the released photon is considered as non – charged in “authentic” / “standard” theory.

In piggy’s theory, the electric interaction is directly reflected by the spiral chilarity of spherical electromagnetic wave (simplified physical model as the “circle kind standing wave”).
As piggy said in the chapter “photon vs anti - photon” in the thread “matter vs anti matter (2)”, released photon should have spiral chilarity too. Why piggy considers released photon should be non – charged too? Because the released photon travels in straight line. The PRESENCE (matter state) is different. The PROPERTY should be different too. No contradiction.

All sciences are INTERCONNECTED. Anything can be explained in explicit physical concepts. Why it must not be a good thing? 呵呵
Science has passed the cross roads.
It’s just a problem facing mankind which can’t be solved by human.


Addendum:
Another example of “The PRESENCE (matter state) is different. The PROPERTY should be different too” is the relativistic principle is not applicable to released photon.
(Relevant materials for reference: some chapters in the physics thread and Pig Head Award 2021 No. 5 position for Mr. pmb)

Liqiang Chen
Oct 24, 2022

The unit charge model piggy post in the thread “matter vs anti - matter” was actually that old version post in “authentic” rabbit Dandan’s PHF galaxy. It’s a primary and rough configuration. It could be the most important model in theoretical physics in this century. We can primary see its power; INTERCONNECTs the classical and modern, Relativity and QM, fundamental natural force, particle physics, cosmology, etc…Seems it’s the core.
Now piggy thinks the pig has to spend some time to do a bit more jobs on that basic to make it a more perfect version.

Moreover, it’s 4D space version containing all around information. Piggy is contemplating “travel back in time” to design a simpler 3D space version for easier understanding. Research should be step by step, from shallow to deep.
Actually this philosophy reflects in computer software. There might be renewed version of Microsoft Word in one or two years…

Although piggy is in absolute cruel environment designed by the First Order, almost an alive dead man in Jiangmen, piggy has to do those jobs. The fundamentals of science would be one step forward. Piggy feels that’s Lord’s mission.

May Lord be with the pig.
Amen

Sense vs non-sense, touchy and feely:

In traditional QM, we really don’t know what physics meaning is the amplitude of probability wave. The square of (absolute value of) amplitude is intensity of probability.
If * is non-sense in math and physics, how can the square of * make sense in math and physics? How lame it all sounds… “gangster’s logic”?
That just mean the traditional “authentic” QM is a freaky theory / “flawed physics”.


That’s one more of the reasons why piggy decided to give up the traditional conception of probability wave and nominated Mr. Adesh, who dared to research such sharp question as the amplitude of wave function, Pig Head Award 2022 No. 3 position.

Piggy feels the traditional QM seems a “tower floating in the air” no matter how delicate its mathematical system is.
Strictly speaking in physics, if people can’t find out the exact physics meaning of the basic, then the whole theoretical building is doubtful.
Perhaps people should touch the elephant from an alternative angle and see whether there could be a better solution to make sense.
Strictly speaking, physics has to tackle such specific problem.

Liqiang Chen
陈力强
Nov 2, 2022

Nowadays, piggy really is surprised why such a non – strict conception of “intensity of probability” can prevail in the mainstream physics for so long a period. It can count as a miracle in the history of science.
Piggy really feels people’s thought has been constrained dead by the “standard” over the past decades.

Smart researchers with positive mind should be AWARE the Pig Head Award 2022 No. 3 position for Mr. Adesh is to dig the root of QM.

“Flawed physics” vs flawless physics (2), touchy and feely

Smart researchers with positive mind should be AWARE actually piggy has solved such specific problem.
In piggy’s unit charge model, wave function is to DESCRIBE the “electric wave”. The amplitude of wave function naturally means the intensity of electric field E.
Ah，seems one more reason is worthy of the pig to entangle with Mr. Duc de Broglie in the future. 呵呵
If Duc de Broglie + htam = flawless physics .Very fun.

Perhaps Einstein would feel very happy now. 呵呵

Why Ukraine kicks with “north pole bear” on the Earth for one year?
Piggy’s explanation seems very simple:
The accommodation ability of the Earth is very limited;

Why QM kicks with Relativity in physics for one century?
Piggy’s explanation seems very complicated:
The accommodation ability of the 3D space is very limited.

Piggy fears the math games in traditional “authentic” QM entirely. If piggy employs the so called what 3D “momentum space” in QM to describe magnetism, it would be anther math game only, because momentum is just a certain value in 3D space, one is one, two is two.
Only 4D space math can demonstrate why there is no “magnetic monopole” exactly. That kind of method in classical electromagnetism as piggy talked about in “T vs R (2)” can’t DESCRIBE “one thing two aspects” perfectly too.
The fun thing is even 3D space unit charge model would be enough to help QM escape “capital punishment”.

Coffin covers appear in this galaxy again, again and will again...the First Order knows the pig is in this galaxy. Bounce...

Heavy accumulated and hard to go back积重难返, touchy and feely

Htam9876@neila9876:
Piggy thinks that some hard problems created by their so called “standard” model have been solved by my “duck” model. Cheer! High five!

Neila9876@htam9876:
It’s “fairy feeling of oneself” (自我感觉良好) only, this tramp in cosmos guesses.

The “standard” model has defined physics dead thing. Those “authentic” guys would try hard to defend their ruling. They never are willing to touch the elephant from an alternative angle. Over 99 percent of the “scientific” territory is in their hands. Perhaps, even G* is not able to pull it out of the mud pit, this tramp in cosmos guesses.


Moreover, the First Law of Cosmos has defined you dead man or a security guard. If people call you physicist, you can imagine how upset and unhappy your those so called old classmates would be? So, no matter how many social resources they input, no matter how complicated the game they play, they will “grind you down” and try hard to defend their perception, until you disappear in this cosmos. It’s very simple logic.

Both cases are “Heavy accumulated and hard to go back积重难返”.
What you are doing is “a dead man tries to save a dead thing”.

Htam9876@neila9876:
Oh, Lord…Then, what should piggy do?


Neila9876@htam9876:
This tramp in cosmos suggests you go to do something makes sense for yourself. Perhaps it’s time for you to “travel back in time” to amend those defective love stories…
I teach you one more spell: “toggle toggle, bungee bungee, blah blah, inward outward, blah blah…autopilot!” You can have a try.

Htam9876@neila9876:
Piggy appreciates you humble opinion:
What you are doing is “a dead man tries to save a dead thing”.
Very much.

Neila9876@htam9876:
This tramp in cosmos has something urgent…
Poop…………
Fortunately this might be an invisible corner in this cosmos…

Htam9876@neila9876:
You pig head should belong to PHF galaxy. Why you PRESENCE here. I think you are immoral.
Neila9876@htam9876:
You pig head should belong to PHF galaxy. Why you PRESENCE here. I think you are immoral.
Htam9876@neila9876:
Poopoooooooooooooooooooooo…
Neila9876@htam9876:
Poopoooooooooooooooooooooo…

Those “authentic” guys perhaps never know such an equation appeared in this cosmos already.
Einstein + htam + Duc de Broglie = flawless physics

But perhaps the First Order has already known it.

Whether this equation exists or not, piggy has to be a dead man. The First Law of Cosmos defined by the First Order never change. Piggy “sure enough”.