Is "after" redundant?

Forums:
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Consecutive events, numbers, etc. follow one after another without an interruption.

Is "after" redundant?

Thanks.

Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 221 • Replies: 3

No top replies

@tanguatlay,

No. It's the usual way of saying that.

One after another, the lemmings jumped off the cliff.

0 Replies

@tanguatlay,

Correction:

You could very well say: Consecutive events, numbers, etc. follow one another without an interruption.

Sorry. Yes, you could say that.

1 Reply

@Mame,

Mame wrote:

Correction:

You could very well say: Consecutive events, numbers, etc. follow one another without an interruption.

Sorry. Yes, you could say that.

Thanks. You have always been helpful!

0 Replies