@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Canada and Russia will be in similar positions – although I think Canada has a lot more water – hosting waves of climate refugees from the global south and settling them in those scantly populated areas. But you can see how unprecedented and disruptive this would be. Where do we find the money to develop the infrastructure to house and feed these people? What will they do to develop their own self-sustaining economies? And since most of these people won't be white what will their reception be? Nationalists in both Russia and North America have shown hostility to non-white, non-christian immigration.
Brazil, Russia, and the USA all have more freshwater than Canada, surprising as it may seem.
Canada spent 8.4 billion in 2021 (https://cidpnsi.ca/canadas-foreign-aid-2012-2/) - surely we could use some of that funding to support climate refugees.
It may be "unprecedented and disruptive" but no more so, surely, than what's occurring in Europe right now with migrants contained in various enclosures (I'm thinking Greece). That's not that a good situation for anyone.
Religion is not as big a deal here as it is in the States. There are racists, nut jobs and nasty people everywhere, but most of us get along and accept the differences. Personally, I welcome the diversity.
It is a big problem and it's time to start doing something about it. The world is not actively working on reducing emissions so we have to deal with the fallout. More and more people will die of heat, thirst, starvation, and disease if we don't. The countries needing the most assistance are not even the ones contributing to the problem so they are not at fault and should be helped.
Top 10 Countries with the Highest Greenhouse Gas Emissions (in million metric tons, 2019 data):*
China — 9,877
United States — 4,745
India — 2,310
Russia — 1,640
Japan — 1,056
Germany — 644
South Korea — 586
Iran — 583
Canada — 571
Saudi Arabia — 495