Reply
Mon 8 Jun, 2020 04:25 am
Compare that cost of lost income, business closures and job losses against the cost of a second wave of infections and the toll it would take in terms of medical costs, suffering and deaths.
“As long as the cost of the former is greater than the latter, it makes sense to ease more, but not otherwise,” he said.
What does the second paragraph mean in relation to the first paragraph?
Thanks.
@tanguatlay,
Let's say that the cost of lost income, business closures and job losses is calculated to be 10 million dollars, and the toll of a second wave of infections is estimated to be 9 million dollars. Since the cost of shutting down is higher than the cost of a second wave of infections, further easing of restrictions can be seen as an acceptable choice.