Reply
Mon 9 May, 2005 08:18 pm
Manitoba couple wants to use baby for unique advertising scheme
at 20:48 on May 9, 2005, EST.
STEVE LAMBERT
WINNIPEG (CP) - It seems you can sell just about anything on the Internet, including advertising space on a baby.
A Winnipeg couple who describe themselves as young, middle-class professionals are offering companies the chance to place ads on all of their baby girl's outdoor clothes for one full year. "People, often . . .wear clothing with logo advertisements on it as it is," said Jonathan, the baby's father, who did not want his last name used.
"They don't get paid a dime. Maybe they should."
Jonathan and his wife, Leanne, have put pictures of their daughter on the EBay auction website, pitching her as a great advertising medium.
"We are constantly stopped on the street, at malls, in the supermarket, in parking lots and the park by total strangers who want to see our little girl," reads the couple's online offer.
"Every single one of them is a potential customer that could be exposed to a company's message."
Jonathan said he and Leanne were inspired by the growing number of adults in the United States and Canada who have used their body parts for ads.
Earlier this year, a Nebraska man auctioned off his forehead as advertising space, and received $37,375 from a company that manufactures snoring remedies.
Last November, Andy Quinlan of Fredericton offered his shaved head as a billboard.
Jonathan said his offer will not harm his baby because the ads will only be on her clothes and her daily routine will not change.
Aware that some people might accuse him of exploiting his child, he said his idea is a lot better than having his child involved in acting or modelling.
"It's . . . less invasive, because you don't have to put them in front of cameras, take them to photographers, stuff like that."
One marketing expert said the growing trend of body advertising is a sign that companies are looking for new ways to attract customers.
"Consumers are bombarded by thousands of messages each day, and what's happening is traditional advertising is kind of getting lost in the clutter," said Robert Warren, a professor at the University of Manitoba who directs the school's Centre for Entrepreneurship.
"As a marketer, you have to come up with a way to cut through all that clutter.
"You're putting something in a place where people wouldn't expect to see an ad."
Although body advertising might be effective, Warren warned companies that use babies risk facing a backlash.
"I'd think a fairly susbstantial minority will see that as exploiting a child, and the companies that do that may run the risk of being branded as nothing more than hirers of child labour," Warren said.
Jonathan and Leanne, whose EBay code name is Panzer1234, are offering to do some of the work for prospective advertisers. If the company doesn't want to provide clothing with ads already attached, they say they will sew the ads onto neutral-coloured clothing.
The couple have drawn a line at the ad's content. Their proposal states that they will not make their baby wear "any language, message or logo deemed controversial or in bad taste."
I'm old fashioned. Babies should not be bulletin boards.
Agreed. It tells you something about the parents, doesn't it?
The Parents-who-do-not-want-to-name-their-name.
Looks like they had a change of mind....or it was forced on them in a roundabout way....
Manitoba couple rescinds offer to use baby for unique advertising scheme
at 13:00 on May 10, 2005, EST.
STEVE LAMBERT
WINNIPEG (CP) - A Manitoba couple has had a change of heart and is no longer offering to use their baby as a sort of crawling billboard.
Jonathan and Leanne of Winnipeg, who did not want their last names revealed, put a proposal on the auction website EBay this week. They offered to let companies place advertisements on all of their baby's outdoor clothing for one year - for the right price.
But after their story was reported across Canada, they pulled the offer.
"Unfortunately, due to negative press, we have removed this auction," reads a message posted to their web page Tuesday.
"People are not open to new ideas like this."
The parents were not available for immediate comment.
In an interview on Monday, before he decided to pull the auction, Jonathan said his idea would not harm his baby, since the ads would be only on her clothing and her daily routine would not be affected.
He also said the idea came to him from media reports of other human advertising.
"The idea came from that guy in (the United States) who has advertising space on his forehead."
In January, Andrew Fischer of Nebraska was paid $37,375 to put a logo of a snoring remedy on his forehead for one month.
Also in January, Joe Tamargo of New York was paid $1,000 to put two permanent tattoos on his arms - one for a pharmaceutical company and one to promote home economics guru Martha Stewart.
Last November, Andy Quinlan of Fredericton offered his shaved head as a billboard.
By Monday evening, Jonathan and Leanne had not received any bids for their baby-ad proposal.
I bet the grandparents of the hapless infant indicated that they were Not Amused.......
At least some sense finally pervailed! Where will this advertising nonsense end?