Reply
Thu 28 Mar, 2019 01:49 am
Traditional Taekwon-do is the original Taekwon-do martial art that was taught by Grandmaster BS Huan since the 1960s.
Shouldn't it be, "had been taught" instead of "was taught"?
Thanks.
has been taught since the 1960s
@tanguatlay,
Or "was taught by Grandmaster BS Huan in the 60's". It depends on whether the Grandmaster is still teaching or not.
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
Or "was taught by Grandmaster BS Huan in the 60's". It depends on whether the Grandmaster is still teaching or not.
BS Huan passed on about five years ago. That's why I think "had been taught" is correct.
@tanguatlay,
I think "had been taught" is awkward. I would go with "Traditional Taekwon-do is the original Taekwon-do martial art that was taught by Grandmaster BS Huan in 1960s." This could be interpreted as it was taught in the 60's but fell out of use. To avoid that interpretation, you could also go with "Traditional Taekwon-do is the original Taekwon-do martial art that was taught by Grandmaster BS Huan starting in 1960s".
@tanguatlay,
"Was" is simple past tense. "Had been" is past tense referring to a past time. If your point of reference is the present you say "was" or "has been". If your point of reference is a time in the past you say "had been".
@Jewels Vern,
Jewels Vern wrote:
"Was" is simple past tense. "Had been" is past tense referring to a past time. If your point of reference is the present you say "was" or "has been". If your point of reference is a time in the past you say "had been"
Thanks, Jewels Vern.
Regarding the "was" in bold, do you mean "is" instead?
@tanguatlay,
" TKD had been taught"... to me, implies that someone else took over his teaching in the interim. I guess that was the case, he retired some time ago, ne?
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
" TKD had been taught"... to me, implies that someone else took over his teaching in the interim. I guess that was the case, he retired some time ago, ne?
No, he passed away about 5 years ago.