2
   

Microcosms

Forums:
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
smog
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Mar, 2005 07:54 am
-people who like smog
-people who love smog
-people who want to be with smog
-people who want to be smog
-people who are smog
-people who used to be smog
-people who breathe in smog
-people who breathe with smog
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 12:51 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
Oh, Abuzz so counts (don't let the Abuzzers figure out that they have been in the minority since shortly after a2k's inception though).

Hmm, with (on a rough count) some 37 out of the top 50 posters on the site, and a little over 60 of the top 100, thats an awfully dominant microcosm...

I've always thought it was a pity that on your thread, "How did you get to know about this site" (that was yours, right?), the back then still rawther obvious option "through Abuzz" wasnt included ... that would have neatly tracked it. But I'm thinking you probably didnt wanna include it exactly b/c of the impression it would at first still have given of A2K as an ex-Abuzzers site ... the percentage would only have gradually declined.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 01:00 pm
Shoulda figured nimh would drag statistics into this Laughing


Well, at least he didn't put up a chart. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 01:05 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Add Forteo to Estrostep and Deprovera. The Forteo people tend not to come back and report; haven't followed the other two.


the people who write on the thread I started on estrostep don't frickin' read...if they actually read the posts before them, they wouldn't keep posting the same dang thing... Confused
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 02:36 pm
Bella Dea wrote:

the people who write on the thread I started on estrostep don't frickin' read...if they actually read the posts before them, they wouldn't keep posting the same dang thing... Confused


Thats pretty typical of the more active political and philosophical threads, too. Not just here, though; its depressin'ly common on just about every discussion site or newsgroup I've come across. ... even the real hardcore, narrow-audience technogeek ones. At least here, flame wars aren't a landscape feature, and you don't see very many trolls.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 02:48 pm
rainforest people!
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 03:07 pm
that's just too funny, sozzzzzzz. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 03:08 pm
Mothers.

Creatures of the Swamp & Naturalists.

Young Lovers Innocent in the Ways of Love.

Adventurous Cooks.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 05:13 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Shoulda figured nimh would drag statistics into this Laughing

Well, at least he didn't put up a chart. :wink:

LOL!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 05:44 pm
msolga wrote:
dlowan wrote:
...But we, on the other hand, break out and infest the site in general - like kangaroo rats.

It is like we have a bat cave.


Yes. Laughing

... & don't forget the free service we provide for the multitudes wanting to migrate to Oz! Are the potential migrators to Oz a category of their own?


Oh - I included them in my original post - only they do not want to migrate to Oz, they wanna migrate to bloody SYDNEY!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 06:39 pm
nimh wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
Shoulda figured nimh would drag statistics into this Laughing
Well, at least he didn't put up a chart. :wink:

LOL!

OK, serves me right for wanting to be flippant ... I actually constructed an entire mock stat-graph image thingie in Photoshop, with a bit of organogram imported from Powerpoint combined with Excel-generated circle graphs and all, none of it making sense except for including the relevant percentages of who likes / doesnt like / doesnt know Roger - and I lost it all in a crash. Computer to nimh: go to bed or do something useful for a bloody change! ;-)
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2005 06:42 pm
Laughing Love ya, nimh - you're a treasure. Never change - Please!!!!.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Mar, 2005 09:03 pm
nimh wrote:
Craven de Kere wrote:
Oh, Abuzz so counts (don't let the Abuzzers figure out that they have been in the minority since shortly after a2k's inception though).

Hmm, with (on a rough count) some 37 out of the top 50 posters on the site, and a little over 60 of the top 100, thats an awfully dominant microcosm...


Yup, loquacious but not the majority.

"An overwhelming minority."
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Mar, 2005 02:35 am
nimh wrote:
nimh wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
Shoulda figured nimh would drag statistics into this Laughing
Well, at least he didn't put up a chart. :wink:

LOL!

OK, serves me right for wanting to be flippant ... I actually constructed an entire mock stat-graph image thingie in Photoshop, with a bit of organogram imported from Powerpoint combined with Excel-generated circle graphs and all, none of it making sense except for including the relevant percentages of who likes / doesnt like / doesnt know Roger - and I lost it all in a crash. Computer to nimh: go to bed or do something useful for a bloody change! ;-)


I can't BELIEVE I missed this one!!!!

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((NIMH))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 12:49 pm
nimh wrote:
none of it making sense except for including the relevant percentages of who likes / doesnt like / doesnt know Roger - and I lost it all in a crash.


I'd still like to see this.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Microcosms
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 02:06:45
▲ ▼