@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
chai2 wrote:That's not mean or grumpy.
yeah it is.
but that's ok - you are the one who gets to deal with the ramifications
No, it's not mean, it's not grumpy, it's not cheap.
Mean, gumpy and cheap would be sitting on my front porch and yelling at each kid as they passed by, and telling the parents to keep them away from me.
Passive aggressive would be posting a sign saying you were sick, to garner pity and thus be left alone.
People don't egg houses around here, nor do they toilet paper or do other stuff like that. We don't have mishchief night. There aren't any ramifications for not drinking the koolaide. I've never even see any smashed pumpkins.
If I really had to think about it, the whole trick or treating thing around my neighborhood seems to be more about the parents showing off not just their kids (because they are so adorable in their professionally made costume), but also their own costumes. About half of them are more dressed up than the kids. In addition, more than a handful chaperon their kids around with glasses of wine or beer.
Of course people with ill intent are around every night of the week, and mornings and afternoon.
What an opportunity to blend in though. A sanctioned holiday where you can go out, knock on doors and gain entrance easily. I don't think I'm remiss in being extra careful on an occassion where that can happen.
I didn't say a word about free candy, brats, and above all, I never used the word hate. I resent that.
I said I have no interest in children. That's it. No interest. That in no way indicates hate.
I'm aware that's usually interpreted as hate, but that is very narrow minded.
I did say that the adults watching a child in the broad daylight climbing between ropes, and the child, had to be none to bright. I sure stand by that. What a bunch of dopes.
It's confusing how you said children are so wrapped up in whatever on that day they don't register things like barriers where they have to actively stoop, step over, avoid falling. But you yourself were bright enough as a child to know that an unlit porch light meant no treats.
So, what is it? Are children today, and their parents dumber than you or I were?
I'm going to say this again, because it really hit home with me when I was writing it yesterday...
Apparantly parents, even the ones who think their kid is the 7th wonder of the world, and who they are convinced they are teaching them to be the most marvelous human ever, can tell their kids that someone with no interest in their activities is just a mean old person who is probably just cheap and miserable. They don't need to tell their kid, or realize themselves, that this is a person who prefers their privacy, and we should all respect that.
Oh yeah. We only have to respect others that aren't like them when it involves race, religion, gender, economics etc. Obviously the person who just doesn't want them knocking on their door is mean, grumpy, cheap and full of hate.
Good to know.
No interest doesn't equal hate. Most people would be appalled at a costume with even the slightest indication it's stereotyping, profiling, or making fun of some group of people. They would protest the person wearing it. But I guess showing no interest in something allows anyone to assume they are mean.
And again, most parents are walking their kids around in pairs from what I can see each year. Both parents are out there with their kids. So who is at their house handing out treats? No one, that's who. They are mostly going to the homes of people who have no children. Maybe some people like that. Maybe some feel they have to put up with it even though they are indifferent. If a person feels strongly enough about not wanting people coming up to their door and banging on it, and puts up a blatently obvious obstacle over every single entryway. Isn't that deserving of a little respect?
It has nothing to do with children, adults, candy, and everything else surrounding this thing of interest to many people.
It's strictly that I don't want Anyone knocking on my door, unless I know the person, and if I'm expecting them. My home, I get to say who comes on my private property.
There needs to be parties instead, where those that have interest in these things can go, and be with others that are interested also.
Ramifications? You mean fear of retaliation? So instead someone needs to be willing to be held hostage to another persons interests, and desires to invade ones private property?