@Finn dAbuzz,
'Prove the site wrong?' What does that even mean?
The fact that a scandal rag tells the occasionally true story doesn't make it a reputable source of information. The best such outlets mix truth and lies.
More importantly, who do I have to prove this to, exactly? I already know it's a piece of crap news source and you wouldn't admit it if I Perry Masoned the **** out of it, so where's the profit for me in doing anything at all?
Cycloptichorn