@centrox,
centrox wrote:
Foofie wrote:I thought today "ilk" is usually a euphemism for some politically incorrect reference to a person's religion/race/ethincity, in my opinion. Example:"Someone of your ilk is known to be quite loud/pushy/obnoxious."
It has no more inherently pejorative implication than the word 'type'.
According to Webster, but not in colloquial use in some regions. Just like "Chap," used by different people, different countries, can have a subtle difference. And, "ilk" is often pejorative, based on the context of the word it is replacing euphemistically. Many nouns are not so subtle ad hominems/epithets, based on the nouns historical usage (think of my ethnic identity, and you would understand).