0
   

TALKING BEHIND PEOPLE`S BACK

Forums:
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
celebritydiscodave
 
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 02:20 am
Everybody does it whilst everybody claims not to do it. When brought to task everybody endeavors to come up with an argument making exception for this particular occasion. Everybody is programmed to believe that talking behind another`s back is wrong, but nobody thinks as far as examining the potential advantages for all parties of so doing. It`s a psychological blind spot, as indeed where there exists all forms of social prejudice. Disparity of years in adult friendships, girl eighteen, boy eighty, being one obvious example.
Getting back on subject then, I`d argue this, that those most capable of providing an individual friendship and support are also those that talk about that person behind their back. Just a few of the reasons: The friend will require support if his mission is to be optimal, the perspectives of others in order to balance out their perception and consequent approach, often a level of natural counselling in order to continue, or at the very least to function at their best on this journey. What is wrong is when it nearly always wrong is when this "gossip"goes full circle - We are programmed to have only negative perception over having our beings questioned behind our back. There is far too little either thought nor said on this subject beyond that which societies psychology would have us believe. Social Philosophy is far from easy because we all tend to be programmed to think alike, whilst at the same time, nobody wants to run their mind up against the universal mind. Thus, progress through debate may be impossible.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 451 • Replies: 18

 
centrox
 
  3  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 03:43 am
@celebritydiscodave,
celebritydiscodave wrote:
girl eighteen, boy eighty,

A boy of eighty? Is English your first language? Your post seems to be crazy nonsense, I am afraid. Sorry.

celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 03:48 am
@celebritydiscodave,
I would have edited - "Collective mind", not "universal mind". Healthy/positive back talking is as consequence to the backdrop of wishing to repair or otherwise advance a relationship. Negative back talking is that designed solely to create elegance in creating a divide.
0 Replies
 
centrox
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:02 am
What point are trying to make? It isn't clear. Is this about some personal issues you are having?
0 Replies
 
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:06 am
@centrox,
To be scared of words on a page is to be scared most easily. Social philosophy/social philosophical progression requires one to rethink how they have always thought. Whilst I consider that in the perfect society how long an individual has been alive should not enter into the equation of any decision to consider them as a friend, I am not an advocate of conventional romantic love, and I would have the age of consent gradually raised to around twenty, or so, years. Along side all of this I`d make relationship studies compulsory on the curriculum from five to sixteen. Nothing whatsoever is in genuine reality actually known of any individual merely on account of the passage of time, and there is even a small group of us ageing thirty years behind the rest. We, none of us, actually owe anything to the passage of time. The future should be in an advanced ability to get inside peoples heads, and thus to better enable, rather than merely discriminating against folk, treating individuals for the individual s whom they actually are. Social philosophy is n`t easy because one has to go back to before a given perception and consider other options to it. Is your grandfather a friend, and do you consider this to be so terribly wrong? I`m in the public domain by the way, simply google celebritydiscodave.
centrox
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:06 am
@centrox,
centrox wrote:
celebritydiscodave wrote:
girl eighteen, boy eighty,
A boy of eighty?

Mind you, when I was 29 I dated (briefly) a girl of 19. She mentioned in conversation that her friend had described me as "that older boy". It was around that moment that I realised that maybe this wasn't going to go anywhere... except maybe the bedroom a few more times.


0 Replies
 
centrox
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:07 am
@celebritydiscodave,
celebritydiscodave wrote:
To be scared of words on a page is to be scared most easily.

Are you crazy, or just playing around?
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:08 am
@celebritydiscodave,
Centrox, I am simply doing social philosophy for social philosophies sake, nothing besides. I`m not a person to hide anything, and I`m all over the internet, nothing cloaked.
0 Replies
 
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:24 am
@centrox,
No, whilst progressive social philosophy is n`t compelled (those in their ivory towers would argue otherwise) to concern oneself with current norms of goings on, of thinking, of perception, it is most hard to argue that it is not required to at least consider as social advancement an instinct for circumstances, social environment/backdrop permitting that might prove to be a preferable place to be. Once adjusted to, obviously, and the collective mind is very slow to alter in its perception anyway. Prejudice/ignorance in my opinion should be, even if not until some future time, dealt with appropriately/optimally well, or at least it would serve us all well to be heading in that direction. To arrive perhaps in one hundred years from now, but hopefully much sooner.
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 04:32 am
@celebritydiscodave,
To date somebody ten years older/younger may in real terms (in the majority of senses and on the majority of levels) be to date somebody the same age. There are limits, 29/19 is likely at the extreme edge, but there could still quite easily have existed a one in one thousand chance that the two of you were actually "the same age"
centrox
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2017 05:29 am
@celebritydiscodave,
celebritydiscodave wrote:
To date somebody ten years older/younger may in real terms (in the majority of senses and on the majority of levels) be to date somebody the same age. There are limits, 29/19 is likely at the extreme edge, but there could still quite easily have existed a one in one thousand chance that the two of you were actually "the same age"

Not clear what you are saying. Elementary mathematics can show that 29 is not equal to 19, so what do you mean by "the same age"? As for your "extreme edge" notion, my father was 13 years older than my mother, and it doesn't seem to have done either of them (or me) any harm.

celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2017 03:11 am
@centrox,
Two individuals may be the same real age at differing ages. There are established numerous physiological markers for age/real age/extent of change in the direction of one`s demise. We are currently still using an arbitrary unit for this measure for change/ageing/our age, and this unit is time. Whist time measures the time it takes to orbit the sun we actually owe this unit of measure nothing whatsoever in relation to our aging. We have used it for want of a superior measure.
Whilst it may be possible, just, for a 29 yr old to be nineteen, so in real terms, (taken from an average for those of nineteen years), it may also be possible, or something approaching it, in reverse, for a nineteen year old to be twenty nine. I t is likely not so exceptional for such a couple, 19 yrs and 29 yrs respec to meet in the middle, to both be around the mid twenties, and far less so within five years. Whilst it is true that we are currently only herd animals I believe that this concept of real age is only just around the corner.
Your father whilst having been alive thirteen years longer might quite realistically have finished up twenty or more years younger. Thirty years, when viewed under the microscope, has been seen to be the absolute limit.
centrox
 
  4  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2017 03:57 am
You are as nutty as a fruit cake, as my dad used to say.
0 Replies
 
centrox
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2017 03:59 am
@celebritydiscodave,
celebritydiscodave wrote:
I believe that this concept of real age is only just around the corner.

That's not what you can hear coming around the corner. It's the nurse pushing the meds trolley.
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2017 06:20 am
@centrox,
I am in probability one of those extreme exceptions for I`m routinely acquiring all comers physical world records at the age of sixty two, and I have been making gains in stamina, strength and endurance to this day. My fan base are all between the ages of twelve and sixteen. That shocked me too on early realisation, but now I have wholly adapted to it. They apparently like me, they number me among their friends, and what on earth could be considered wrong with that. I have no reason whatsoever to consider other than they have excellent instinct, most of them. I have never been witness to any of their number showing friendship to other older men. For every thousand of their interactions with older people only one may be sinister, or the incidents may be even lower than that. The media feeds us only what we already believe to be
true, what we want to hear/what sells the newspaper, and these may be very isolated cases.
What most causes us to age in time is our over elaborate herd instinct.
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2017 07:38 am
@celebritydiscodave,
The main reason that the majority of us are ageing too quickly is the want of effort in staying young.
0 Replies
 
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2017 07:42 am
@centrox,
A boy of eighty? Is English your first language? Your post seems to be crazy nonsense, I am afraid. Sorry.
Open your mind before, not after, you commence on a social philosophical journey. Many of the attributes which we tend to associate with boyhood are available for us to be had at almost any age. If we do n`t have them it is likely we do n`t want them, we`d much rather grow old. To genuinely retain one`s youth one must think independently of others of the same or near same generation, one must be a misfit. Everybody always leaves when it begins to get interesting!!
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Mon 19 Jun, 2017 08:09 am
I'm getting a headache
celebritydiscodave
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Jun, 2017 01:02 am
@glitterbag,
For instance, if at any given age post twenty five we associate with those of around our age and think of ourselves as being that age this is a very significant factor in being that age. If for instance, to keep it truly realistic, at sixty years of age we think only of ourselves as being twenty, associate with twenty year olds, are training still harder with every passing year, and genuinely believe that we can still have the best body in the world (and everything else which goes with this territory of perception) this is all very powerful in terms of being twenty years old. We will be in significantly slower ageing, and likely considerably younger than our years, perhaps by decades.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » TALKING BEHIND PEOPLE`S BACK
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2025 at 10:37:42
▲ ▼