@Blickers,
News to Blickers, whom I hardly ever disagree with: women vary in today's world.
I lived for a while in yesteryears. At my nice high school (not one I got to pick), in 1959, I wanted to be a doctor, and Carolyn wanted to be an engineer.
The nuns wouldn't send transcripts for Carolyn. I didn't find out what happened on that: I might remember that her father threatened to sue.
With me, I was interviewing a nun for the school paper, and it got turned around so she interviewed me, finding out I wanted to go into medicine. Then came the full blast effort to get me to join the order (I almost bought the shoes for postulants), enticing me that I could be a nursing nun in India. With help from my family, I got out of that.
A year or two later, when I was at university, I sent for the MCat catalog, and found that almost every medical school in the US had zero woman in their last year's admissions; a small percentage did, say, 6 women among 95 men. I no longer have that catalog, but I'll estimate that less than 10 percent took any women at all. Several of them just took
one.
This was just before the Civil Rights Act, which changed our U.S. world - suddenly women could get into law and med schools and (I dunno) engineering classes. There had already been a bunch of us in chem classes, and that might have grown as well.
There is (or was) a bias that women are dumb at math. Hmmmm. My dyslexic cousin who used tape recorders in university so that she caught everything, had a perfect 800 SAT math score (that was the highest back then). She later worked for the US Gov in some capacity that was out of bounds to talk about.
What am I getting at? Brains differ, women's or men's.
Maybe there is a preponderance in varied directions; I take some bit of that is the vast weight of culture.