Fri 7 Apr, 2017 07:46 pm
i heard someone say 'a tree is always a tree', and arguing that that statement is always objective.
to me however, it seems redundant, because by definition a tree is always a tree.
i'm wondering which one is it, objective or redundant? or is it both?
(also not sure whether the riddle tag fits or not)
thank you, i knew there was a better word than redundant for this, it just never came to mind.