Good point about proxies.
Quote:Some day we'll have to have strong end to end authentication so that sites can associate you with an identity
Didn't Intel
already try that?
(to anyone who's not familiar with the processor serial number feature, it was included on PIII's and Intel took so much heat over it that they discontinued it.)
The whole issue reminds me of John Walker's
The Digital Imprimatur It's a lengthy essay and he annoying starts off arguing that NAT is killing the internet as we know it, which I think is a weak argument. At any rate, read through it. It's about a year old now, but it's quite interesting. The basic gist is that in order to gain things such as "strong end to end authentication", it's very likely that we'll give up a lot in the process due to the way it will happen. It's really no small issue. A scheme that could actually guarantee that could stop all spam and virii. This is very enticing indeed. Check out the paper. To be honest, I'm not really sure what to think about the whole thing.
Things will have to go in that direction though. If you believe some, we
only have a couple of years left. Although I doubt that, think back a ways. Do you remember the internet 5+ years ago (or perhaps even 2 years ago for that matter....). It wasn't like it is now. There was bad stuff, but spamming, spyware, (possibly) virii weren't anywhere near as prominent as they are today. It definitely feels like we're going downhill here. Changes will have to be made to stop this. Hopefully, users can maintain their rights and freedoms as it happens.