@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:Many countries do not have the infrastructure which the US has for landline phones and hence the proliferation of cell phone is greater, or at least it has been up to now. Cell phone infrastructure is much cheaper to build from scratch.
Having re-read Gunga's post quoted here, I have to say there is a great deal of truth in it. Because of cell phone technology, a lot of countries, for example in Africa, are able to (put simply) skip the wired-telephone stage of telecoms evolution.
Mobile phones will account for almost one-tenth of African GDP by 2020. The explosive growth in the telecoms industry is having a major economic, social and political impact on the continent.
Running fixed-line phone service infrastructure to every last little village would be crazily expensive and, these days, not necessary. Even in the cities that were wired, the old state-run fixed-line telephone companies were inefficient monopolies, prompting many in Africa to take up mobiles from around 2000. The number of cell phones has grown from fewer than four million in 1998 to more than four hundred million today, almost half the population of the continent. They aren't just used for voice calls, either. They are bringing in a digital revolution. Payments, access to public services, business opportunities, participation in democracy, etc.
In fact, much though I have found some of Gunga's posts elsewhere very distasteful, verging on crazy, especially his perpetual sneering about "Obunga", his remarks about third-world phone infrastructure and the impact of developments in cell technology are pretty accurate, and looking at his post carefully, I do not really see much sneering at other countries.