Would a woman like it if her boyfriend or husband openly lets her cheat on him?

It's sort of like a Merry Cheaters club?

There are couples who have open relationships. An "open relationship" is a relationship where both partners agree that it is OK to have sex with other people. Some people find this works well, although I don't think I would ever want to be in this type of relationship. To each his own.

The idea of seeking out new sexual partners for a girlfriend doesn't interest me at all. The idea of my girlfriend finding new sexual partners for me is a little offputting (I prefer to choose myself with whom I have sex).

I imagine that this might be exciting for some couples (not involving me) to do one time. I can't imagine doing this more than once. It would get boring pretty quickly.

In an open relationship the word "cheat" doesn't apply since both partners have agreed that it is acceptable.

There are couples who agree to have an 'open relationship' with sex as long as there is no emotional attachment, but I know of none that allow emotional attachment without sex.

Pretty fucked up world.

Did you mean sex without emotional attachment?

Why is that "fucked up"? Unless you use that phrase literally rather than metaphorically.

It's your fetish, dear. But you don't say if your wife is a willing partner to something you set up.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/07/29/cuckolding-the-sex-fetish-for-intellectuals.html

I say everything comes with age and life style that is changing over the years.
If couple are crazy about each other to the rest - I am happy for them.
However it is a rare occurrence and some people refuse to live in a stale pond.

Definitely metaphorically.
But because I think you like pushing things to the limits -

It's fucked up because there is more pleasure to be had in sex with someone you are emotionally involved with.
So by saying 'you can screw other people but just don't love them', you are limiting their pleasure.

This is I am sorry nonsense!
Sex without emotional involvement (except during sex)
does not limited pleasure! It is pleasant if you possess
skills and willing to participate.

I don't think this time I am pushing the limits very much at all. There are lots of people who enjoy one night stands... it is pretty common and clearly part of human nature.

I believe that many people have different stages in their lives. They can enjoy having sex just for pleasure (and often when several short term partners) during one part of their live.

And then having longer term emotionally involved relationships when they are ready for it.

If two people are having sex without any emotional involvement (other than sharing a physically enjoyable experience, and neither wants anything more at that time in their lives... who is limiting whom?

What the hell are you and Eliusa reading? It couldn't possibly be what I actually wrote. But in case I don't get what your argument is, let's look at it again.
I said:
I didn't say there was no pleasure to be had in a one night stand, I said there was more to be had with someone you were emotionally involved with.

Are you two arguing for the opposite case?

Maybe the world is more fucked up than I thought.

Because max takes the opposing view on everything, and the other one is an idiot.

Glad I could clear that up.

I'll consider that possibility.. : )

I don't disagree with you that it is pleasurable to have sex with someone with whom you are emotionally involved.

I am saying that in the times when I don't have or want emotional involvement, sex is still pretty pleasurable. I think I am only disagreeing with you about one thing; your claim that any of this (either sex with a deep emotional connection or without) is "fucked up".

Sex between consenting adults of all flavors is fun. That is why humans have been doing it for tens of thousands of years. There is nothing wrong with that.

Come on max, Quit have'n sex with your fist and talk to me.

The question is about more, i.e., which sex is most pleasurable.

I'm not about banning pleasure, I want More.

It depends on the situation, Leadfoot. There is a thrill to having sex with someone new even if you know it will never last. There is also a different pleasure to having sex with someone with whom you have had a deep long term meaningful relationship. I found both of these situations to be very pleasurable. I have even at times found "having sex with my fist" to be pleasurable.

The question of which is more pleasurable is based on the context. There have been times in my life where I didn't want an romantic entanglement and found that casual sex was the most pleasurable.

But again, it depends on the context, the stage of life you are in and other circumstances.

Human beings express their sexuality in many different ways. I don't see why you say that any expression of human sexuality is "fucked up".

You are claiming that sex without love is limited!!!!

It is most ridiculous statement I be seen yet!
You can love person and have mediocre sex
and have mindblowing sex with a stranger!

Have you ever had sex? You can lie. I know it is
hard question for man to answer

So get more!!! It doesn't mean there is not even MORE...
How much more do you want? LOL

Are you too smart enough to think that people in love can't have bad sex?
What a moron!