@Robert Gentel,
Robert Gentel wrote:oralloy wrote:The Atlanta bomber was a lone crackpot. The horsewhipping of peaceful democracy protesters was done by the security forces of the state that was putting on the Olympics.
No, the Cossacks are an non-state militia,
The Cossacks work for the Russian government. They do have a sort of unofficial role. But that doesn't mean they aren't government agents. Rather it means that they are used to do things that would be considered illegal for normal government officials to do.
Russia is a dictatorship. There are agents who will carry out Putin's will no matter how illegal it is.
Robert Gentel wrote:and the Russian police showed up to disrupt their attack on Pussy Riot
All the reports that I heard said the police stood around and just let the Cossacks do their thing.
And that is what I would expect of a brutal dictatorship. Ordinary police wouldn't dare to interfere when the dictator's agents were suppressing the people.
Robert Gentel wrote:and Russian authorities vowed to prosecute them.
I'm sure that's what the KGB propaganda office told the world.
Robert Gentel wrote:In any case, no serious injury was caused
Horsewhipping peaceful democracy protesters in public may not have caused any serious injuries, but it was still a perfect example of everything that is wrong with the Olympics.
Robert Gentel wrote:and my point is that their games were more successful from a security standpoint that our Atlanta games.
I see the Russian security as a negative. Something to sneer at.
Robert Gentel wrote:But when bad things happen in America we see it as situational, jee whiz something bad happened ("just some lone wolf"). When it happens in developing countries Americans often see it as dispositional (their culture and standards are just not up to snuff, they aren't good enough to host). This is a
fundamental attribution error.
An attack from a lone crackpot is legitimately different from the ruthless suppression of a dictatorship.
Robert Gentel wrote:oralloy wrote:It is true that I don't call the Atlanta games a disaster, but the corrupt international Olympic body that favors third-world nations over the United States derided them pretty severely, and they sneered when they did it. (I sneered right back at them.)
No, they did not.
I remember when they did it.
Robert Gentel wrote:And the notion that they favor third world nations is completely disconnected from reality. Developing nations have hardly ever hosted the games, and I think this is the first time that the continent it is on has ever hosted it, while it has been hosted in America many times.
Here is the list of hosts, you can see from a quick scan of the list that your claim is not just a bit inaccurate but that it is entirely so, the games are overwhelmingly hosted in developed nations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_Games_host_cities#Olympic_host_cities
When they sneer at us for being a first world country, and they openly praise Olympics at third-world countries (preferably ruthless dictatorships), it is reasonable to say that they favor third-world dictatorships.