Philosophy of Religion

Philosophers spoke about religion perfectly. They are usually men. There is a feminine look: foundation of moral values must be preserved and protected. There is a religion, we need to learn as a historical phenomenon that has affected the world. The old religion can be forgotten. And then again, there will be new religion with the problems of previous ones.

I think if we conflate the superfluous religious odium we could perhaps influence the aggregate of supernatural discombobulation,

Smiley, Widening his vocabulary trying to sound more photosynthesis

For me Philosophy of Religion is only useful regarding sociology about how humans deal with the intuition of metaphysics. I rather go straight to the source and do philosophy of metaphysics and skip the social reasons and the cultural justifications. Debating what man needs is an exercise in futility. I rather debate what we don't need when going about sociology.
Above mundane stuff I much prefer Ontology. My life one way or another naturally revolves about inquiry on that topic. Its a personal need.