2
   

Does "was subverted to the whims" mean "was completely destroyed to become the whims"?

 
 
Reply Fri 18 Dec, 2015 10:44 pm


Context:

There is another possibility, of course, and it is both the most reasonable and least odious: the biblical God is a fiction, like Zeus and the thousands of other dead gods whom most sane human beings now ignore. Can you prove that Zeus does not exist? Of course not. And yet, just imagine if we lived in a society where people spent tens of billions of dollars of their personal income each year propitiating the gods of Mount Olympus, where the government spent billions more in tax dollars to support institutions devoted to these gods, where untold billions more in tax subsidies were given to pagan temples, where elected officials did their best to impede medical research out of deference to The Iliad and The Odyssey, and where every debate about public policy was subverted to the whims of ancient authors who wrote well, but who didn't know enough about the nature of reality to keep their excrement out of their food. This would be a horrific misappropriation of our material, moral, and intellectual resources. And yet that is exactly the society we are living in. This is the woefully irrational world that you and your fellow Christians are working so tirelessly to create.

-Sam Harris
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 391 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
Robert Gentel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Dec, 2015 10:48 pm
@oristarA,
It means "undermined by the desires"....
0 Replies
 
FBM
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Dec, 2015 10:49 pm
@oristarA,
Every debate about public policy was subjected to...

The authors took important subjects and (inadvertently?) diminished them (or their nuances, importance, significance) in their writings due to the fact that the authors didn't understand the philosophical issues and nuances being discussed.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Dec, 2015 11:07 pm
@FBM,
FBM wrote:

Every debate about public policy was subjected to...

The authors took important subjects and (inadvertently?) diminished them (or their nuances, importance, significance) in their writings due to the fact that the authors didn't understand the philosophical issues and nuances being discussed.


Excellent.
Thank you both.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "was subverted to the whims" mean "was completely destroyed to become the whims"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 04:37:04