0
   

Free Banking Era Note Issue

 
 
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 08:19 am
During the free banking era banks could issue notes that were redeemable on demand for specie. When a bank made a loan they would do so by issuing notes. My question is, why wouldn't the person who was issued these notes not immediately turn around and redeem them for specie. This would eliminate their exposure to discounting. I understand why they would be accepted once in circulation, but not how they would ever make it past the original holder. It seems like it would make no sense to take notes over specie as the initial receiver of the loan.

Same goes for deposits. If I deposited specie and wanted to make a withdrawal, why would I ever keep notes? It would make sense to immediately redeem the notes. Notes offer no additional protection against robbery and are less durable. Also, notes always run a risk of devaluation or complete failure.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 441 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
puzzledperson
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 09:20 pm
@blitz459,
Specie (typically gold or silver coins) are heavy, and issued in denominations whose size is limited because it is proportional to the amount of metal physically present.

Banknotes are lightweight, can be issued in arbitrarily large denominations by private commercial banks, and are easily secreted on one's person or among one's effects, which makes them less subject to robbery.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 10:00 pm
@puzzledperson,
True, but a simplification of Gresham's Law does say that "bad money drives good money out". Those banks want to hang onto all the 'good' money they can get.
puzzledperson
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 10:37 pm
@roger,
Your original question asked why someone to whom a banknote was issued would hang on to it instead of instantly redeeming it for specie.

If you want to know what banks got out of it, the answer is the ability to make more loans, hence more profits from interest payments by borrowers.

Banks issued loans in the form of banknotes, not specie. Because they assumed that not everyone who held their banknotes would attempt to redeem them for specie simultaneously, they could issue more loans (banknotes) than they possessed in gold or silver coins (specie) or other reserves.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 10:48 pm
@puzzledperson,
Yes. At this point, I would like to point out that I didn't have a question, whether original or follow on. The citation of Gresham's Law was an interesting side note, or so I thought.
puzzledperson
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 Oct, 2015 11:36 pm
@roger,
My apologies Roger, I somehow gained the erroneous impression that you were the originator.

I think Gresham's law properly applies to specie debasement (e.g. mixing with base metals) by governments.

But if you're suggesting that banks of the period hoarded gold you are probably right. In any case I suggest you make your point more explicitly so that it can be discussed and elaborated.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Who or What is Responsible? - Discussion by Merry Andrew
Debt ceiling? - Question by Buffalo
The Legacy of the Reagan Revolution - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Let it crash - Discussion by FreeDuck
No real limits to growth - Discussion by gungasnake
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
Wage discrimination - Question by zewittykitty
Central Bank Operations? - Question by NewToEcons
Frictional unemployment vs structural - Question by MateuszJanczura
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Free Banking Era Note Issue
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2024 at 03:00:53