Reply
Mon 8 Jun, 2015 02:54 pm
The Supreme Court has gone way beyond their power to judge. No where in the constitution will you find any mention of gay rights, abortion restrictions, voting restrictions, gerrymandering, drugs or unlimited political money, The supreme court is only one of the three equal pillars of power, not the supreme decider of all issues. Why doesn't Obama and congress take them on, exercise their own power to okay or veto all supreme court decisions?
@Rickoshay75,
Because the Supreme Court as presently constituted is just what a republican congress wants because they have made congress rich with their corporations are exercising free speech with their buying of congress with big bucks bull shyt. Elect a republican president so he can put 2 or 3 more conservative judges in position to rape the public with more decisions like free speech by corporations.
@Rickoshay75,
Rickoshay75 wrote:Why doesn't Obama and congress take them on, exercise their own power to okay or veto all supreme court decisions?
It doesn't work that way.
@RABEL222,
F.D.R. tried the Supreme Court Packing Bill in the 1930's. It didn't work then, not likely now.
@jcboy,
Interesting.
Has either the executive or legislative branch ever overturned a Supreme Court decision without constitutional revision?
Supreme Courts overturn each other all the time. You can google it and Im sure someone like Wikipedia will even give the case names.
Remember Roe v Wade is a target for an overturning by a Conservative court.
_____________
The Constitution can also overturn itself by subsequent amendment
@neologist,
neologist wrote:
Rickoshay75 wrote:Why doesn't Obama and congress take them on, exercise their own power to okay or veto all supreme court decisions?
It doesn't work that way.
Not now, but congress and Obama can take back their power anytime they want to. Two pillars of power against one.
@Rickoshay75,
Rickoshay75 wrote: . . . congress and Obama can take back their power anytime they want to. Two pillars of power against one.
That would take a costitutional ammendment, not nearly as easy to accomplish as it is to mouth the words. It would override 200+ years of constitutional phiilosophy.