Reply
Tue 29 Jun, 2004 08:32 pm
Ashcroft v. ACLU
Quote:Tuesday, June 29, 2004
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked enforcement of a law intended to protect children from pornography on the Internet, saying the law probably violates free-speech guarantees.
By a 5-4 vote, the high court said 1998 legislation "likely violates the First Amendment."
The court ordered parties from both sides to reconsider the issue in a lower-court trial. The ruling gives the Bush administration a chance to prove the law does not violate free-speech rights.
The case tested the free-speech rights of adults against the power of Congress to control Internet commerce.
The 1998 law, known as the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), never took effect. It would have authorized fines up to $50,000 for the crime of placing material that is "harmful to minors" within the easy reach of children on the Internet, according to The Associated Press.
See the rest here:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/29/scotus.web.indecency/index.html
Poor Crisco John.
He will just have to go back to the Nineties and masturbate to Playboy or the Starr report now...
Hmm. . . should be interesting to see how this pans out. I would love to remove the coppa agreement on my forum. I find it annoying at best. I don't even have a working system to actually receive permissions from parents, so it's really just for show.
If the lower court rules that this law is void, I'll probably write an interesting parody of the agreement page.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace