@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:It's not the same thing at all. Drugs are very different from firearms.
Possession of drugs and possession of defensive guns
are both equally matters of
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.
Thay r
both within the
natural rights of the owners who bought them.
Do u see that similarity, Izzy ?
I dunno, but I suspect that u r
right about popular opinion
being against possession of guns in England, but an Englishman
has the Natural right to defend his property, including his life,
the same as his
natural right to choose his own religion.
The same as the collective does
NOT have the right to select
an Englishman's favorite color or his taste in food or other art,
the collective has
no authority to vote away his right to self defense.
Do u agree???
izzythepush wrote:Our laws have stopped school shootings, not since Dunblane, whereas it seems like a regular incidence in your country. The facts support it, and a mandatory 5 years in prison just for possessing an illegal firearm means most criminals don't think it's worth the risk. Anyway criminals don't tend to go on shooting rampages, sad loners tend to do that.
England survived a lot
LONGER WITHOUT gun laws,
until around 1920, in a
state of freedom, than it did with them.
izzythepush wrote:Your idea of victims killing predators is a pipe dream, it hardly ever happens,
It happened to
ME,
in another century on the hi way in the dark of nite, until
MY OWN gun came out.
I had been counseled, many years before, by my TV repairman,
to always carry a brightly reflective, silver colored revolver.
Until then, it was
blued; dark
blue.
I got a 2 inch .44 caliber revolver Taurus Model 445 in stainless steel mirror.
Thay fled before I coud line up a shot. I care about that.
NOT being defense
less in a predatory emergency is important to me.
I want victims to have
MORE POWER than their predators.
I love to read of
victims of felony
killing their predators; that's
fun!
It makes me
PROUD to be an
American.
It grinds me seeing
un-armed teenagers running away from human monsters
in the movies. It is
grossly IRRESPONSIBLE, to be going around
un-armed,
like
failing to wear a seatbelt while drunken driving.
I console myself that the teenagers r getting what thay
deserve
(being murdered,
seriatim by the villain) for being
un-armed,
but I can t help it: my heart goes out to them in the movie.
I need to
restrain myself from yelling: "
shoot him, u fools!
SHOOT HIM with a heavy caliber revolver!!!
OPEN UP on him!!!"
On the seldom occasions that it actually happens, it feels really good,
whether the victims kill him with a gun or a sharp object or anything else.
What is
your feeling about that, Izzy, in the movies and in real life ?????
izzythepush wrote:you can quote a few isolated examples if you want,
I have done that in multiple on-line fora, including A2K,
many times. I began new threads, but of recent years,
I have been posting most of them to the
Rexred threads
and to the Parados thread.
izzythepush wrote:but people with guns are far more likely to shoot family members
by mistake than an assailant.
I 'm sure that is
not true.
That South African shud have been convicted of malicious murder.
David