@farmerman,
dont worry theres no way i would let you do my work, and im not sure how you could... anyway i'd say having the idea to try a forum and make an account and send messages back and forth is still doing my work, this is part of the project talking and working things out with industry experienced people, i'd say it counts as puting my time in, and in the end will gain the learning eperience, i'm busy don't worry im not escaping and just sitting on my couch, im trying to put my learning experience on steroids for this bit of the project if possible. This is one of six courses and five labs that im taking, time efficiency is the most important thing i can do right now, and i plan on persueing hydrogeology(remmediation and such) not economic geology so my main focus is not necessarily this project ( budgeting and cost projecting). I know there are plenty of great companies you're right!... what im hoping is that someone has experience with one they would reccomend... or if you have advice on how to appraoch a company with what we already have for the property..I've never done any of this so im just seeing what the wonderful geology world/internet can help me figure out a little quicker. With that said I'm stoked somone answered. thanks for all that info!
we have 71 rock samples and 23.90 g/t Au and 503 g/t Ag.. Arsenopyrite hosts the gold... its kind of weak but there is a lot of silicification at the surface which we think may represent a larger fluid system underground... So we're in a post tectonic hydro deposit
consists mainly of granitoid plutons, with a few greenstone belts between the plutonic rocks. Its in the glennie domain.... tons of gold has been found in this region already
We should deffinitely go for a GIS survey
The only reason i said no geophys is because i had talk with my proffessor and he mentioned it wouldn't be our best bet...
drilling is gonna kill our budget... so we need to do as little as possible? how should that work into planning? i understand the concept of converging the drilling.... so is the best thing to do: do a geophys microgravity... followed by a few drill holes based on that data...
does it come down to choosing the next method and just going with it... or is there some sort of like logical way of talking about what should come next...should we do a bit more trenching first... i have bedrock and steep cliffs heavily wooded... muskeg... theres a fault along the eastern edge of the property.. lakes cover about 25% of the property.... if geophys is cheap why have none of the previous folks who staked the property have done one yet?
or what sort of things should i be thinking about or would you be thinking about? im just after some conversation and opinion about how to do this the best way possible...