That's not a history book and I'm pretty sure you know that. You're entire thread of hyperbolic cynicism isn't original, refreshing, or even close to correct. And the goofy thing is, the person (BillRM) in which you are trying to convince otherwise, isn't some fundamentalist religious proselytizer though you're treating him like he's a bible thumper when he hasn't indicated any such way.
History books are books with footnotes, bibliographies, debated theories, and attempts at evidence to prove said theories. You're supposed to read every history with a grain of salt. Read many history books and compare what each one has to say to and against each other then decide for yourself.
Spouting out and only spouting out forceful cynicism just to be reactionary isn't going to win you arguments or actually help you find the truth (though technically truth for truth's sake is highly overrated and subjective at best).
I suggest instead of looking4truth
you find a hobby that's not so goofy. Being a cynical and blatant reactionary rebel isn't getting you anywhere to finding enlightenment any time soon.