0
   

Speed of light revisited still again

 
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 11:26 am
@Frank Apisa,
Sorry Frank

Excuse: old age, laziness, not necessarily in that order
0 Replies
 
Rickoshay75
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 11:54 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

Quote:
Of course there are loose ends to my speculation. However if we believe Sib there are still a few such in Einstein



Jesus H. Christ.

Did you just make a comparison between you and your theories and my friend Al Einstein and his?????

Here is a picture of me discussing those kinds of shenanigans with him. When I mentioned that some people do it, he just said, "Ahhh, **** 'em!"

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk17/frankapisa/Einstein.jpg


I have two things to say to Einstein -- go back and test your E=MC again under the same kind off conditions used in 1919, with modern equipment, and get a haircut.
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 11:57 am
@Rickoshay75,
Quote:
go back and test your E=MC again
Isn’t that E = MC^2
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Wow, that's sixty years.... - Question by dalehileman
The infinite Universe revisited - Discussion by dalehileman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/29/2024 at 03:33:07