8
   

Don’t Call Me a ‘Housewife’…OK! (ツ)

 
 
Ceili
 
  2  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 08:21 pm
@Rockhead,
I didn't realize I was getting out of hand.. I'm thinking of starting a few plants though.. Can't ship him this stuff though, not sure if it's strong enough anyhow.
0 Replies
 
Pemerson
 
  2  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 08:35 pm
What's to say? The grass is always greener...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 08:49 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:
BillRM needs a handful. yesterday...


Too late . . .
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 09:56 pm
@Ceili,
Ceili wrote:

Jesus H. Christ... When did you fools wake up and think the universe was made up in the USA alone. Women have always been a part of the working class. Women have always had jobs outside of the home. The dewey eyed view of 1950's housewife only ever existed in a precious few places and times in history, mostly on the silver screen. If your 60' and 70's feminists thought they changed the world by bringing women employment, they are as deluded as this stupid stereotype. Women have never only been mothers. Read a book..


Perhaps it is you who should do some reading. No one said that women never worked outside the home. However it is an undeniable fact of life both in the USA and Canada that the number of working mothers and working single mothers has vastly increased as a relative portion of the female population compared to what prevailed prior to (say) 1975. Moreover the number of families sustained by two working parents has also increased significantly as a fraction of the total. These changes have had significant social and economic effects in terms 0f child care, school hours and the direct costs of rearing children and - some would argue - the average quality of life for child rearing. I haven't suggested that the direct and side effects of this rather profound change are all bad - only that the result has been less than an unmixed blessing.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  6  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 10:14 pm
Perhaps I should have pinpointed the fools in question, terribly sorry I lumped you all together.
Once again, women have for centuries worked outside the home or took work in. Women working is not the downfall of "man"kind and there are a ton of reasons why prices have risen. Leave it to Hawkeye to make the correlation that men are suffering because of a false ideal. It never really existed but for a very short time and place in history. Men aren't failing university because women are succeeding, or that there are more women working for equal pay, perhaps they'd rather work in the trades or aren't interested in the humanities. Blaming women for all the sins in the world gets tres annoying. Maybe next he'll be blaming his own obvious failing on brain damage, maybe mommy didn't just drop him but she threw him against a wall... Regardless, I blame her for him, 'cause if any son of mine had that attitude, I go all rosemary's baby on him too.
georgeob1
 
  2  
Reply Tue 8 Nov, 2011 10:25 pm
@Ceili,
I think you are opposing an argument that no one here has yet made. I earlier noted that my two married daughters are working professionals, and are rearing young children at the same time, and that in many ways the demands on them are far greater than those on previous generations of women. This observation was offered in part to note that the "advances" and "liberation" achieved by women in the 1970s were not an entirely unmixed blessing. Young women today do indeed face a broader array of personal challenges today than previously and have fewer social protections with which to sustain them in child rearing than did earlier generations of women. It is true that they have greater opportunities at work than previ0usly, but , as I said, it is not an unmixed benefit.

Setaanta followed that with an uncharacteristically illogical rant about President Reagan, and I responded by nothing that the social change in question (at least in this country) largely occurred before the Reagan presidency began.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 09:46 am
Exactly what kind of drugs do you have, Ceili?
0 Replies
 
smcmonagle
 
  0  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 01:08 pm
@Setanta,
ohh open your mind already
smcmonagle
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 01:10 pm
@georgeob1,
thank you>> i may not be as well written as you but these are the points im trying to convey
0 Replies
 
smcmonagle
 
  0  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 01:14 pm
@Ceili,
my dear. You really need to try going further back in history. Perhaps even prehistory. Just do what the "creator" intended for you and all else will fall in place. Ill tell you, if i attempted conceiving a child the "creator" would be sorely upset. And too would really f things up
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 07:08 pm
@smcmonagle,
My mind is open. But you're hilariously amusing. It appears that if someone does not agree with the drivel you post, you will condemn them as close-minded. You can't beat this place for free entertainment.
smcmonagle
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 07:18 pm
@Setanta,
glad you enjoy it>> and most of the time im pissing my pants when i write some of this ****
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 07:25 pm
@smcmonagle,
Your scatalogical dilemmas are neither entertaining nor a subject of any interest to me.
smcmonagle
 
  0  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 07:41 pm
@Setanta,
what happened to the free entertainment.. and only a tool would own a Pomeranian
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 07:59 pm
The free entertainment is still there, it's just that you peeing your pants is not a part of it. I do not own a Pomeranian.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  3  
Reply Wed 9 Nov, 2011 10:22 pm
@smcmonagle,
And the charm school dropout shows why he's still a virgin...
Lustig Andrei
 
  3  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2011 12:38 am
@Ceili,
Ceili wrote:

Jesus H. Christ... When did you fools wake up and think the universe was made up in the USA alone. Women have always been a part of the working class. Women have always had jobs outside of the home. The dewey eyed view of 1950's housewife only ever existed in a precious few places and times in history, mostly on the silver screen. If your 60' and 70's feminists thought they changed the world by bringing women employment, they are as deluded as this stupid stereotype. Women have never only been mothers. Read a book..



A definite thumbs-up on that one, Ceili. I'm about to turn 73 yrs old (or young, if you like). So I'm from that generation where idiots like mcgonagle and hawkturd would assume I had a mother who was a housewife and nothing but. Guess what? I don't recall any times in my life when mom didn't have a full-time job outside the home, often working right alongside dad. But I come from a European background, you see, where this was in no sense unusual. My mother worked in an office until her retirement at age 62. She would have stayed to 65 except that her arthritis had gotten so bad it was physically painful to have to go in and sit behind a desk all day.

What the hell's a 'housewife' anyhow? I agree with the OP -- no woman ever married a house.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2011 10:28 am
Disclaimer: Away put your lawyers, I mean you no harm...

This thread is not endorsed by Lucasfilm Ltd. or Twentieth Century Fox and is intended for entertainment and information purposes only.

The Official Star Wars site can be found at www.starwars.com.

Star Wars, the Star Wars logo, all names and pictures of Star Wars characters, vehicles and any other Star Wars related items are registered trademarks and/or copyrights of Lucasfilm Ltd., or their respective trademark and copyright holders.

Any original content in this post, both graphical and textual, is accidental and the intellectual property of Shoebacca - unless otherwise indicated.



OB one, perfect sense making you are.
Chai two, early must I rise. Leave now you must!
Jespah, powerful you have become, the dark side I sense in you. –
“I'm beginning to like her.”
Beth, a Jedi uses the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.
Boy oh boy JC, truly wonderful, the mind of a child is.
Scaramouche, may the force be with you.
Slappy, you’re all right, kid! Now let’s blow this thing and go home.
Hawkeye, I’ve got a very bad feeling about this.
Ceili, this is some rescue. You came in here and you didn’t have a plan for getting out? You were my only hope!
Setanta, aren’t you a little tall for a stormtrooper?
Rocky, clear your mind you must, if you are to discover the real villain behind this thread.
Lustiges Taschenbuch alias Lustig Andrei, anagram Saint Ludger, if there's a bright center to this thread, you're on the planet that its closest to.

Do or do not; there is no try…

However, lexicon MANacles still restrict the realization of non-male expression, in that MANkind or huMANkind MANages to MANipulate both MALE, feMALE, MAN and woMAN.

Is it therefore only possible to describe a non-male adult by the addition of a ‘hu’, ‘fe,’ or ‘wo’ prefix?

Give me a break; I want to celebrate a goddess by more than just a freekin’ prefix.

What may I ask has ‘man’ to do with hyMAN, MENopause or MENstruate?
Geez Louise!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Nov, 2011 10:34 am
Or, as Hufe Wo, the third century Chinese philosopher and flim-flam man is reputed to have said:

Give me a break, OK? I'm just trying to earn a living.
0 Replies
 
smcmonagle
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Nov, 2011 12:05 am
@Ceili,
this is a tough site>>all you people wanna do is talk ****, Doesnt anyone just want to have a convo..
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/12/2024 at 06:23:33