0
   

The Loons at PETA Crack me UP...How about You?

 
 
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2011 08:46 pm

Quote:
The "pin-up" style photo of a raw chicken lounging seductively ran in Wednesday's food section of the New York Times along with a story on the appeal of crispy, savory chicken skin. Now the animal cruelty prevention organization is aiming their laser-beam target at the old gray lady.

"When I saw it I just couldn't believe that an editor of The New York Times would find it acceptable," PETA's founder and president Ingrid Newkirk told The Atlantic Wire. "It's downright offensive, not just to people who care about animals but almost to everyone. It's a plucked, beheaded, young chicken in a young pose," she said.

Tina Loit, the Times photo editor who commissioned the shoot didn't see it that way. "That chicken had attitude," she said of the model, who was propped into a come-hither position with the help of weights and wire.

The image was intended as a humorous, eye-catching approach to your standard food fetish art. But PETA's Newkirk is calling it necrophilia.

Maybe he's mad that the Times stole a signature PETA move. For years, their print and commercial campaigns have relied on sex, particularly naked women, to attract media attention. Sex has become so synonymous with PETA, they're launching a pornography site linked, inexplicably, to their animal rights message. So what's so bad about a lounging chicken?


If anything, PETA should be thanking the Times. After staring long enough at the photo of this goose-pimpled, cross-legged, headless lady-harlot, I may never eat another chicken again

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/food/is-this-chicken-too-sexy-peta-thinks-so-2572348/

EDIT: trying to get a pic but this one is not working for some reason as a img link

http://armannd.com/wp-content/uploads/new-york-times-sexy-chicken1.jpg
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 611 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2011 09:21 pm
Quote:
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, however, did not. "When I saw it I just couldn't believe that an editor of The New York Times would find it acceptable," PETA's founder and president Ingrid Newkirk told The Atlantic Wire. "It's downright offensive, not just to people who care about animals but almost to everyone. It's a plucked, beheaded, young chicken in a young pose," she said.

Of course, PETA is also a group that knows that sex sells. The group is planning to launch a porn site that will feature sexy people alongside messages about why we shouldn't behead, pluck, and eat chickens.

The Times did not get back to us with a response to Newkirk. But on Wednesday afternoon, its Lens blog provided the backstory of the photograph by Tony Cenicola. "My original concept was sort of a languid nude," said Tina Loite, photo editor for the Dining section. But it took some studio magic to put the sexy back into a dead bird. "Once he propped it up," Loite said, "it became a completely different vibe. The chicken had attitude."

Newkirk sees it differently: "It's necrophilia. It's not amusing. It's just ghastly and sickly. It's not fitting for The New York Times."

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/business/2011/09/petas-not-laughing-new-york-timess-sexy-chicken/43087/
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Loons at PETA Crack me UP...How about You?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/30/2025 at 05:46:37