Well, Dave that's where you are wrong.
See I could care less if you agree with me or not.
How much less
coud u CARE
I was not rude to him until he was rude to me and others.
I questioned his reasoning but then, like you, he quickly proved that
if we didn't agree with him I was a crackpot liberal.. Your favourite dirty word.
Well, liberal mean deviated or distorted
That 's not always good.
Someone who deviates from his contractual duty to u,
in doing so may well CHEAT
u; that 's bad.
On the other hand, when Rudolf Hess deviated from nazism
and when Boris Yeltsin deviated from communism, those were GOOD
Ceili wrote:People have the natural right to keep their own property
I invite you to reread his posts. I'm sure you'll see that your new friend is not the warmest guy on the board.
What he fails to understand stand is that government coffers don't grow on their own.
If his business gets a tax break, and a thousand people get welfare,
they all take from the same pot.
has a moral right
Its charity; the same as if your dad gives u present for your birthday.
do it, if he wants to, but he has no duty to do so.
On the other hand, your dad has no right to steal your property.
They all have their hands in the big cookie jar.
The average middle class tax must make up the shortfall.
not if spending is cut
to abide the deficit
Again: the charity cases have NO right
to the handouts that thay get.
I have no duty to get ripped off by government for the benefit
of financial losers and the federal government was never granted power
to rip off the rich or middle classes to aid the poor. That can only be done by USURPATION
with the same
authority as a schoolyard bully.