Should you have to take a drug test to get TANF?

ehBeth wrote:

NotreDame05 wrote:

How is it not the same?

because you don't understand the math.

I think everyone understands your political position on this. The problem is that your math/economic skills aren't up to the discussion.

It has nothing to do with matematics. Nothing. The problem is your reasoning skills are not up to the discussion as you have deluded yourself into thinking this has anything to do with mathematics. The issue is whether the source of the money makes any difference and this is not a mathetmatical issue.

Goal, I think, the poster being a from football powerhouse.

<just reading along here, nothing to see>

Oh yeah, because you are the beacon of being hospitable.

did Ceili invite you to her home?

Yup, another ambulance chaser... ignorant and abusive.

So basically, we should ignore what you've written then. K, done.

Since it seems rather impossible for you to understand the simple point being made, then yes the prudent thing for you to do would be to ignore what I write until such time as you can actually comprehend what is being stated. If you require a foreign language to understand what is being stated, let me know, I might be able to accommodate you.

Ceili wrote:

So basically, we should ignore what you've written then. K, done.

NotreDame05 wrote:

Since it seems rather impossible for you to understand the simple point being made, then yes the prudent thing for you to do would be to ignore what I write until such time as you can actually comprehend what is being stated. If you require a foreign language to understand what is being stated, let me know, I might be able to accommodate you.

Many of the liberals in this forum (not all of them)
prefer to subordinate sound reasoning to emotion
and to blind themselves to logic that leads to a result that thay don't like.





David

ehBeth wrote:

NotreDame05 wrote:

How is it not the same?

because you don't understand the math.

I think everyone understands your political position on this.
The problem is that your math/economic skills aren't up to the discussion.

It has nothing to do with matematics. Nothing. The problem is your reasoning skills are not up to the discussion as you have deluded yourself into thinking this has anything to do with mathematics. The issue is whether the source of the money makes any difference and this is not a mathetmatical issue.

I specifically contend that your reasoning skills aren't up to the discussion either.

I would also note that you seem to have quickly developed a reputation for being a real dick.
Is that what you set out to do, or was your goal?

Cycloptichorn

did you invite him?

NotreDame05 wrote:

ehBeth wrote:

NotreDame05 wrote:

How is it not the same?

because you don't understand the math.

I think everyone understands your political position on this.
The problem is that your math/economic skills aren't up to the discussion.

It has nothing to do with matematics. Nothing. The problem is your reasoning skills are not up to the discussion as you have deluded yourself into thinking this has anything to do with mathematics. The issue is whether the source of the money makes any difference and this is not a mathetmatical issue.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

I specifically contend that your reasoning skills aren't up to the discussion either.

I would also note that you seem to have quickly developed a reputation for being a real dick.
Is that what you set out to do, or was your goal?

Cycloptichorn

ND05, please note that Cy 's definition of "a real dick" (as distinct from a false one)
is anyone who either supports the Original understanding of fundamental Constitutional philosophy,
or anyone of whom he disapproves.

I 'd not take him too seriously.





David

So basically, we should ignore what you've written then. K, done.

Since it seems rather impossible for you to understand the simple point being made, then yes the prudent thing for you to do would be to ignore what I write until such time as you can actually comprehend what is being stated. If you require a foreign language to understand what is being stated, let me know, I might be able to accommodate you.

Many of the liberals in this forum (not all of them)
prefer to subordinate sound reasoning to emotion
and to blind themselves to logic that leads to a result that thay don't like.





David

Yeah I am coming to this realization. What is more intriguing is publicly reprimanding me for some of my less than cordial replies when they were in response to rather insulting and hostile comments and attitudes in the first place from themselves.

he showed fear, dave?

please show us where...

(just following your line of reasoning...)

What he fails to understand stand is that government coffers don't grow on their own. If his business gets a tax break, and a thousand people get welfare, they all take from the same pot. They all have their hands in the big cookie jar. The average middle class tax must make up the shortfall. It doesn't matter in the end which way the money was given or taken, if it's not there things will not be paid for, the government then runs at a deficit.