0
   

UN: US could easily become a major energy exporter

 
 
Reply Fri 10 Dec, 2010 12:38 pm
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/12/un_report_us_can_quickly_becom.html

Quote:

For the past year or so I have been writing about the vast wealth America has beneath our feet in the form of shale gas. We have huge amounts trapped in shale rock that can be liberated by blasting it open via a process called hydraulic fractioning ("fracking"). Wells are drilled horizontally miles underground and then a stream of water, sand, and a minor amount of chemicals fracture the rock and release the gas. All this happens far below the surface and the water tables. Natural gas is relatively clean-burning, is on-shore, and is ours.

Now comes a report from the UN (of all places) that asserts America can be on the verge of energy independence and can become one of the world's great exporters of energy because of our shale gas and oil reserves. Natural gas is the one commodity that has been plummeting in price and delivering an economic jolt of its own for consumers more accustomed to higher energy prices.

From the Washington Examiner that picked up a report from Canada's Globe and Mail :

Toronto's Globe & Mail quotes a UN report that includes this observation: "Within a decade or so, North America will almost certainly emerge as the world's biggest supplier - and exporter - of reasonably cheap energy."

How can that be? As The New York Times reported last month, it's because the U.S. is incredibly rich with natural gas and oil shale deposits that can be reached affordably using hydraulic fracturing, the injection of liquids into rock formations thousands of feet below the drinking water table....


Quote:

....
It is all there for the taking. But Democrats threaten to plug all those holes warming our homes and saving us money. Meanwhile, oil prices are going through the roof -- helped along by the Obama administration's efforts to stop oil drilling off-shore, take land out of commission for exploring, and impose new rules and regulations.

Not only do they overtly and covertly favor green schemes that try to kill carbon in all forms, they have tried to enact one roadblock after another to stop us from tapping our shale gas and oil reserves (see, for example, my columns "Cheap Natural Gas and Its Democratic Enemies," a follow-up to my previous column Cheap Natural Gas and Its Enemies).

Who would benefit from stopping this energy revolution in its tracks? George Soros, environmentalists, green schemers that need government help (subsidies, investments, mandates) to make their ventures fly -- and who reward Democrats with donations, Russia, Hugo Chavez, Arab oil powers, terrorists, and other assorted international bad actors. The Russian government recently expressed concern regarding their international power because America was developing our shale gas resources.

Those are the groups Democrats help when they curtail our own development of this treasure beneath our feet.


  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 924 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Dec, 2010 12:43 pm
Bullshit. The US is beginning to do this. The have already started developing the oil sands in N. Dakota but it is a very expensive way to get the light crude it is producing and with it comes the anti-oil demonstrators. Just ask Alberta...
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Dec, 2010 01:55 pm
@Ceili,
The guy is mainly talking about natural gas.
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Dec, 2010 03:41 pm
@gungasnake,
The biggest problem to N. America producing it's own oil and gas is the expense. It's difficult to get to, either under vast amounts of clay, water or shale. In Saudi, they can do directional drilling through sand and produce the stuff for about a $1 a barrel. They also don't give a damn about the environment. Nobody cares if a sand dune is polluted but because we use a lot of water per barrel, there's always the risk of contamination.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Dec, 2010 08:41 am
@Ceili,
Quote:
The biggest problem to N. America producing it's own oil and gas is the expense. It's difficult to get to, either under vast amounts of clay, water or shale. In Saudi, they can do directional drilling through sand and produce the stuff for about a $1 a barrel. They also don't give a damn about the environment. Nobody cares if a sand dune is polluted but because we use a lot of water per barrel, there's always the risk of contamination
.

However it is there and if we become willing to pay the price in money and polluted we can get at it,

So the picture of the US running out of energy sources is unlikely to say the least.

Or put another way it placed a floor on how bad our energy situation could become.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Dec, 2010 09:41 am
@BillRM,
There's also the question of what sort of pollution problem would be worse than 9-11, i.e. the question of what the Saudis DO with the money they get for oil.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » UN: US could easily become a major energy exporter
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 09:03:45