Dollar predicted burning towers

It's not a false memory (although probably not from as long ago as you believe) -- I remember seeing that bit of hokum as well.

But it turned out to be at least partially true, didn't it, Jespah?

Nope, not even close.

The twin towers were burning, were they not?

Predicting the past is rather easy.

If you noticed, max, Odak said (1987) which was some years before 2001.

This is fun...

When do you think the conspirators designed the image on the dollar bill?

Don't be silly, max, it is a silly little parlor trick. Interesting, and telling that you want to go full bore on this but you are frightened to death of any real discussion on real evidence.

Yawn... (I hoped for a minute there that you were going to entertain me for a change.)

Just another typically lame max response. You are so predictable, max.

It shocks me when a purported physics grad is such an intellectual coward.

You jumped in with both feet, max, when you thought you saw an opportunity to divert and distract from the actual science, the evidence, the facts surrounding 9/11 but you are, always have been totally afraid to actually address the reality found within the actual science, the evidence, the facts surrounding 9/11.

The games you play illustrate that you can't be trusted at all to discuss anything in an honest, even handed fashion.

You should have just kept your big mouth shut. You exposed yourself as a person not to be trusted.

lol

Your nervous laugh gives you away, max.

Someone who is honest, someone who pretends to believe in science doesn't try to control the science in a discussion of said science.

This is you, max. Nevertheless Max persists.

Someone who is honest, someone who pretends to believe in science wouldn't sit silent while others who also purport to be scientists, spread baldfaced lies about science and the evidence.

This is you, max. Nevertheless Max persists.

Maxdancona was the one in the Physics of 9/11 thread who was explaining the collapse of the North Tower without knowing the specs of the core structure. He was making **** up as he went along. For example, he thought that the upper block of the Tower dropped down at virtual freefall speed because the core structure below it had disconnected and dropped away.

A disease that not only max has. farmerman, Setanta, ... all share this deep ignorance or much much worse, willful ignorance/pretense.

No person can ignore all the total impossibilities of the USGOCT and claim to be a sane, rational adult.



Great conclusion, max!!! I can see that science and truth is very important to you.

How does a totally undamaged massive core section that had stood there carrying all that weight since 1973 all of a sudden become disconnected and drop away according to the USGOCT?

You, max, and everybody else really knows, the totally undamaged massive core sections that had stood there carrying all that weight since 1973 were destroyed by the US government nanothermite.

There is no other explanation for the drop of the tower on WTC1 before the floors began to move. The core columns were destroyed. The floors above the damaged section were turned to dust before they ever impacted the lower, undamaged sections.

Look at the tilting section of WTC2. It was falling outward and then it too had explosives bring it back into the tower footprint and blow it into dust.

You, and everybody knows this to be the case because there was molten steel that flowed out of the damaged north face of WTC2, indicating the nanothermite that was used to do precollapse explosions.

You all know there were precollapse explosions because one of them blew a human being out of a twin tower window before the collapse.

You all know there were precollapse explosions because George W Bush admitted that there were explosions in the twin towers before they were destroyed by the US governments' nanothermite.