@rosborne979,
rosborne979 wrote:You seem to be giving birds (animals) a lot of credit
for how their thought process works.
NO; not at all
(except for
observed results of co-ordinated attack patterns of wolves & African lions).
Ever hear of being
"foxy"? The thought is the father of the deed.
rosborne979 wrote:Do you have anything to back up your conjecture,
I have no conjecture. I am merely
EXPOSING your quackery &
mental chaos,
when u
fake that u know what animals think.
Your post has clearly implied that u have had the thought processes of
ALL
of the animals under your telepathic surveillace. (I doubt that u actually have.)
The baseless intellectual arrogance of your post attracted my attention.
The burden of proof is on the affirmative,
not on my skepticism.
rosborne979 wrote:or do you just prefer to snip at me when I give the standard scientific assessment of animal behavior.
Assuming, that to actually be true,
your appeals to authority have no probative value.
Maybe next week u 'll be referring us to what Aristotle thought, in proof of your notions.
rosborne979 wrote:I don't think we need to read a cow's mind to know that it probably can't do calculus.
U r having a
LOT of trouble with concepts.
1. Definitionally, a cow cannot be neuter gender
and logically
MUST be "she" not "it". (Is your math equally as good?)
2.
HOW have u calculated the
*probability* of what she can
DO in her mind?
Where did u get your data? How did u
test them?
What were the precise results of your probability analysis ?
Inquiring minds wanna know.
( I expect him to answer in a fully conclusory form:
"the results were that cows cannot think
because cows cannot think, because cows cannot think,
because cows cannot think and the
reason for that
is that: cows cannot think." )
rosborne979 wrote: And we don't need to "prove" that pigs can't fly just because they don't have wings.
Agreed that u don 't have that
"need".
( Thay
can fly, if u put them on planes [or in catapults {
pigapults
??}]. )
rosborne979 wrote:The original question of this thread was "can animals philosophise?"
My answer is NO based on our understanding of animals, their brains,
and eons of observation of their behavior.
Does your understanding
have a bearing upon the truth of what u believe?
If it actually does,
then I 'll be very interested in your investment advice.
rosborne979 wrote:That's the obvious answer.
"Obvious" to
U.
It used to be
"obvious" that the Earth was flat,
orbited by the sun.
rosborne979 wrote:If you have a more extraordinary claim to make,
then you will need extraordinary evidence to back it up.
I don 't pretend to know what anyone is able to think,
beyond resulting observed conduct.
David