0
   

economics terminology

 
 
Reply Mon 16 Aug, 2010 01:26 am
What is the phrase used by economists to describe a situation where you invest in something which is not giving returns but it is more costly to pull out so you keep pouring money in? Is there a theory to account for when one should cut one´s losses?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 967 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Aug, 2010 02:13 am
@Richard Johnson,
You're describing a situation of high sunk (already incurred) costs and high exit costs; it's part of the theory of incumbent advantage, or barriers to entry, common in many industries. A search for "sunk costs" on the online A-Z glossary of The Economist magazine comes up with 2 results:
Quote:

Sunk costs
When what is done cannot be undone. Sunk costs are costs that have been incurred and cannot be reversed, for example, spending on ADVERTISING or researching a product idea. They can be a barrier to entry. If potential entrants would have to incur similar costs, which would not be recoverable if the entry failed, they may be scared off.

Barriers to entry (or exit)
How firms keep out competition--an important source of incumbent advantage. There are four main sorts of barriers.
*A firm may own a crucial resource, such as an oil well, or it may have an exclusive operating licence, for instance, to broadcast on a particular radio wavelength.
*A big firm with economies of scale may have a significant competitive advantage because it can produce a large output at lower costs than can a smaller potential rival.
*An incumbent firm may make it hard for a would-be entrant by incurring huge sunk costs, spending lots of money on things such as advertising, which any rival must match to compete effectively but which have no value if the attempt to compete should fail.
*Powerful firms can discourage entry by raising exit costs, for example, by making it an industry norm to hire workers on long-term contracts, which make firing an expensive process.

http://www.economist.com/research/economics/searchActionTerms.cfm?query=sunk+costs
Link to general research materials, same source: http://www.economist.com/research/
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Aug, 2010 02:40 am
@Richard Johnson,
Richard Johnson wrote:

... Is there a theory to account for when one should cut one´s losses?

The second part of your question is addressed in finance theory. The time to cut one's losses is when the liquidation value of a project (or an entire company) exceeds its value as a going concern. These values can both be negative. Link to related accounting resource:
http://knol.google.com/k/nowmaster-accounting/what-is-the-going-concern-concept-in/y2cary3n6mng/9#
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Where is the US economy headed? - Discussion by au1929
The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
  1. Forums
  2. » economics terminology
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/15/2025 at 01:31:38