0
   

Natural Philosophy Website and Conference

 
 
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 05:01 am

The Natural Philosophy Alliance Website:

http://www.worldnpa.org/main/

The conference this past weekend:

http://conf17.worldnpa.org/

Speaking at the conference this weekend was (amongst others) one Ralph Sansbury,associated with the Classical Physics Institute of NY.

Sansbury is the main author of the theory of gravity which I subscribe to, which involves sub-electron (subtron) particles and electrostatic dipoles. The subject of electrostatic dipoles associated with electrons has come up recently in news media and even the FreeRepublic forum:

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/haog-rst072010.php
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2556024/posts?page=1

The thing which is interesting about Sansbury's subtron theory is that it arose from mundane studies of reversable electrostatic fields being generated by currents and could not plausibly be seen as a search for any sort of a back-of-the-book solution to anything involving a preconceived assumption based on "thought experiments". The claim is that electrons are orbital systems like atoms themselves and that electrical tension will stretch those orbits into ellipses rather than circles, which would in fact create a dipole, and that the alignment of those dipoles in their gigantic numbers produces a field.

The study of such dipoles also produces a rational explanation for gravity and I believe also for light, albeit I subscribe to Wal Thornhill's version of that theory more than to Sansbury's. The computed necessary speed of a sub-electron particle would get you to one of the near galaxies in a few seconds. Wal Thornhill believes it is these kinds of particles moving through Dayton Miller's ether which create light waves.

Sansbury's recent update to the little book about light and gravity in pdf format can be downloaded:

http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/ebooks/Sansbury-GravityMagnetismandLight.pdf
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 321 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Jul, 2010 05:17 am
@gungasnake,
I see that Russ Mglenn is still pumping out his "abiotic oil" theory. He uses the Russian model of finding oil in granite deposits when, as everyone knows, this was a huge fraud.


The "White Tiger" oil play, reportedly having its source rock in granite is actually a fault block that is a "horst" wherein oil from the next door lacustrine basin (a sedimentary basin where the oil formed) was migratiung into the fault fracture on the updip side. Old fashioned geology showed how the "abiogenic " theory was all wet. (AS it is in all other cases also)

There are several reasons to try to believe in abiotic oil

1Its a support of a young earth

2 Its a refutation of "peak oil"

Too bad its all crap
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Natural Philosophy Website and Conference
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 07/22/2025 at 07:04:19