@Carico,
I can see that Carico has become infected with the Insane God Myth mental derangement.
Although JBeukema'a arguments in his reply on [Page 1] are perfectly logical, resonable and Truth-based, they can have no effect on the outcome. That is not because the arguments weren't good....they were absolutely correct.
Carico has had his sanity destroyed by his society. I bet he will not answer to the aforementioned post. And he will not answer the points in Mine.
"Nevertheless, in order to deny God, scientists are trying to contradict the "laws of nature" and trying to make the impossible possible. "
No, no one needs to deny god because the god creature does not exist. Those who cliam that the god creature exists, need to present the concrete proof. There is currently no legitimate evidence that a god creature exists. So it is you that tries to reverse things.
Now, what "law of nature" do you refer to? The one you just invented (superior and inferior)? There are many things that are Superior that come from inferior sources, depending on the definitions of the two. If you define superior as more physically complicated, what about atomic elements formed by nuclear fusion in stars?
There are just many examples that can be made, after you define the rather subjective terms of superior and inferior.
"So they developed a theory of "evolution""
Or just maybe developed the theory of evolution because of the studies they had been doing logically pointed to the evolution principals as being the most logical solution to the question at hand.
"which is the opposite notion that the superior can come from the inferior, i.e., the clay can form the potter. "
You have not even proved that your "law" (presuming it is correct) even applies to the universe. Maybe the universe does not have a beginning and an end. Maybe it never "came from" anywhere....it just goes through a cycle.
"Needless to say, this requires decades of thinking, reworking, and voluminous explanations as contradictory as they are convoluted"
Or read My above post. There is a theory that seems to work, and I came up with that adlib.
"and they still don't know the origin of man."
So...
if they are wrong you are right by default?
"That's not surprising since evolution is as impossible as a piece of artwork creating the artist."
Maybe it isn't. You have not gotten that far yet.
"But that's how irrational and illogical one has to be to deny God."
Incorrect. The Forbidden Truth is that the god is an invention of societal leaders. The god myth is actually an addictive mental delusion. It infects the host brain, and attacks the sanity, rationality and ability to recognise Truth of it's unfortunate victim. This case being you.
"So since the premise of "evolution" is based on a lie"
No its not. The only thing that is certainly based on lies in this tpoic is your insane god / christian religion. That is based on nothing but lies, myths, irrational and insane statements, and total lack of legitimate evidence.
"then I'm afraid you'll have to keep telling one lie after another until you've told so many lies, that you've either contradicted the first lie or have forgotten what the first lie was!"
That is what all god-believing inferiors do. Sadly, most do not even know they are dealing with a lie, because they cannt face the Forbidden Truth, reality and death.
"And that's what scientists do every time they find another "missing' link. Since they only have one end of the chain, "modern-day" humans, then the links in the "middle" can never fit into the chain".
Well, see above abswers. Its really the same thing. Even you can work out what I would say about that.