0
   

Dawkins Is No More Darwinist! He Converted To Space Religion!

 
 
Reply Mon 9 Nov, 2009 09:11 pm
http://tr1.harunyahya.com/Image/ilan_richard_dawkins_ing.JPG[/CENTER]



From Mr. Adnan Oktar's interview dated 30 October 2009:


ADNAN OKTAR: We invite Darwinists to science. They evade science, they do not use science, they have turned their backs to science. We, on the other hand, encourage them to use science. For instance they evade paleonthology, which is a science that lays Darwinism to waste. There are 250 million fossils that prove Creation. If a person feigns ignorance about these fossils and avoids to examine them, and simply says, "I do not want to see them", this means he evades science. What does science dictate? It dictates, "A protein can not come into existence by chance." If one avoids to examine the molecule structure of proteins, and is unwilling to examine the probability of its coming into existence by chance, this simply means avoidance from science. People examine the structure of chromosomes under the electron microscope. We see its structure. Avoiding to examine them and attributing the formation of chromosomes to aliens, saying, "Aliens hurled chromosomes to the Earth through the athmosphere", then this is one of the worst examples of nonsense and it is avoidance from science. We invite them to science, that is, to the truth and righteousness. That is to say, a man like Dawkins, the foremost protector of Darwinism in the world... We gave an announcement to one of the most circulated newspapers of Britain, the Times, to invite him to debate. He insistently avoids. If he is a scientist, then he should come so that we can debate. He goes and debates with secondary-school students, with evangelical clergy and rabbis. But he should come and discuss this matter with those who have information about it. We won't take too much of his time; only half an hour. We will host him in the best manner in Turkey. We show utmost respect and kindness but he intensively avoids because here he will face scientific facts, fossils. He will face the facts revealed by paleonthology and other disciplines. Look do you know what Dawkins, in whom everyone trusts, says? He "Aliens sent chromosomes from the space to the Earth." Is this science? This is dishonor. He used to advocate pagan religion and now he has started to advocate the pagan religion. That is, this is sheer fallacy.

ADNAN OKTAR: One can not attain anywhere with impossibility. That is, this is something impossible because it is a theory whose invalidity has been certified by 250 million fossils. Creation has been clearly established by the examination of the structure of proteins and chromosomes and even a man like Dawkins started to say that this is done by aliens. He says that human beings were created by aliens. In other words, Dawkins says that there is some sort of Creation. There is a Creator but they are aliens, he says. When you ask who created aliens, he remains speechless.

These are words uttered out of desparation. That is, they have nothing to do in the face of faith. They are in panic.

ADNAN OKTAR: This shows that they essentially have faith. But out of pride, egocentricity and arrogance they find it more appropriate to submit themselves to aliens, since they do not want to submit themselves to Allah. With the mindset they have, they consider it better to see aliens like Allah (Allah is beyond this.)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,192 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Nov, 2009 04:47 am
@ahmetsecer,
"You cannot argue with a believer, they do not believe out of evidence or proofs, but out of the NEED to believe"
Petey J
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Nov, 2009 05:01 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Nov, 2009 07:03 am
@Petey J,
Petey J.;68891 wrote:
For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.


If no proof is possible then for what reason can you cite as the cause of your belief in the first place?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dawkins Is No More Darwinist! He Converted To Space Religion!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 04:13:27