1
   

Book Tells Of Dissent In Bush's Inner Circle

 
 
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:10 pm
Book Tells Of Dissent In Bush's Inner Circle
White House Granted Author Unusual Access

By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 3, 2007; A01

Karl Rove told George W. Bush before the 2000 election that it was a bad idea to name Richard B. Cheney as his running mate, and Rove later raised objections to the nomination of Harriet E. Miers to the Supreme Court, according to a new book on the Bush presidency.

In "Dead Certain: The Presidency of George Bush," journalist Robert Draper writes that Rove told Bush he should not tap Cheney for the Republican ticket: "Selecting Daddy's top foreign-policy guru ran counter to message. It was worse than a safe pick -- it was needy." But Bush did not care -- he was comfortable with Cheney and "saw no harm in giving his VP unprecedented run of the place."

When Rove, President Bush's top political adviser, expressed concerns about the Miers selection, he was "shouted down" and subsequently muted his objections, Draper writes, while other advisers did not realize the outcry the nomination would cause within the president's conservative political base.

It was John G. Roberts Jr., now the chief justice of the United States, who suggested Miers to Bush as a possible Supreme Court justice, according to the book. Miers, the White House counsel and a Bush loyalist from Texas, did not want the job, but Bush and first lady Laura Bush prevailed on her to accept the nomination, Draper writes.

After Miers withdrew in the face of the conservative furor, Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. was selected and confirmed for the seat.

Roberts rejected Draper's report when asked about it last night.

"The account is not true," said Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg, after consulting with Roberts. "The chief justice did not suggest Harriet Miers to the president."

In recounting the Miers nomination and other controversies of the Bush presidency, Draper offers an intimate portrait of a White House racked by more internal dissent and infighting than is commonly portrayed and of a president who would, alternately, intensely review speeches line by line or act strangely disengaged from big issues.

Draper, a national correspondent for GQ, first wrote about Bush in 1998, when he was the Texas governor. He received unusual cooperation from the White House in preparing "Dead Certain," which will hit bookstores tomorrow. In addition to conducting six interviews with the president, Draper said, he also interviewed Rove, Cheney, Laura Bush, and many senior White House and administration officials.

Draper writes that Bush was "gassed" after an 80-minute bike ride at his Crawford, Tex., ranch on the day before Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast and was largely silent during a subsequent video briefing from then-FEMA Director Michael D. Brown and other top officials making preparations for the storm.

He also reports that the president took an informal poll of his top advisers in April 2006 on whether to fire Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

During a private dinner at the White House to discuss how to buoy Bush's presidency, seven advisers voted to dump Rumsfeld, including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, incoming chief of staff Joshua B. Bolten, the outgoing chief, Andrew H. Card Jr., and Ed Gillespie, then an outside adviser and now White House counselor. Bush raised his hand along with three others who wanted Rumsfeld to stay, including Rove and national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley. Rumsfeld was ousted after the November elections.

The book offers more than 400 footnotes, but Draper does not make clear the sourcing for some of the more arresting assertions -- such as the one about Roberts's role in the Miers nomination, which has previously not come to light. Roberts's nomination was highly praised by conservatives, and they criticized Miers as lacking conservative credentials.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said yesterday that he had no comment on the book, including the claim about the Miers nomination.

Draper offers some intriguing details about Bush's personal habits, such as his intense love of biking. He reports that White House advance teams and the Secret Service "devoted inordinate energy to satisfying Bush's need for biking trails," descending on a town a couple of days before the president's arrival to find secluded hotels and trails the boss would find challenging.

He also makes new disclosures about the behind-the-scenes infighting at the White House that helped prompt the change from Card to Bolten in the spring of 2006. By that point, he reports, some close to the president had concluded that "the White House management structure had collapsed," with senior aides Rove and Dan Bartlett "constantly at war."

He quotes Gillespie as telling one Republican while running interference for Alito's Supreme Court nomination: "I'm going crazy over here. I feel like a shuttle diplomat, going from office to office. No one will talk to each other."

It has been reported that Card first suggested he be replaced to help rejuvenate the White House. But Draper writes that Bush settled on Bolten, then director of the Office of Management and Budget, as the new chief of staff before telling Card. When Card congratulated Bolten on his new assignment, he writes, Bolten "could tell that Card was somewhat surprised and hurt that Bush had moved so swiftly to select a replacement."

Rove, meanwhile, was not happy, Draper writes, with Bolten's decision to strip him of his oversight of policy at the White House, directing his focus instead to politics and the coming midterm elections. Bolten noticed that other staffers were "intimidated" by Rove, and Rove was seen as doing too much, "freelancing, insinuating himself into the message world . . . parachuting into Capitol Hill whenever it suited him."

Draper offers little additional insight on or details of Cheney's large influence in administration policy. But he writes that the vice president did find himself ruminating over mistakes made, chief among them installing L. Paul Bremer and the Coalition Provisional Authority to run Iraq for a year after the invasion. Instead, Draper suggests, Cheney believes that the White House should have set up a provisional government right away, as Ahmed Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress recommended from the beginning.

Several of Bush's top advisers believe that the president's view of postwar Iraq was significantly affected by his meeting with three Iraqi exiles in the Oval Office several months before the 2003 invasion, Draper reports.

He writes that all three exiles agreed without qualification that "Iraq would greet American forces with enthusiasm. Ethnic and religious tensions would dissolve with the collapse of Saddam's regime. And democracy would spring forth with little effort -- particularly in light of Bush's commitment to rebuild the country."

In the CIA leak scandal, Rove assured Bush, Draper reports, that he had known nothing about Valerie Plame, a CIA operative whose covert status was revealed by administration officials to reporters after Plame's husband criticized the administration's case for war in Iraq. "When Bush learned otherwise," he said, "he hit the roof."

Bush considered whether to cooperate with the book for several months, Draper reports. The two men met for the first time on Dec. 12, 2006, and at the conclusion, the president agreed to another interview. In one of the interviews, he looked ahead to his post-presidency, talking of his plans to build an institute focused on freedom and to "replenish the ol' coffers" by giving paid speeches.

He told Draper he could see himself shuttling between Dallas and Crawford. Noting that he ran into former president Bill Clinton at the United Nations last year, Bush added, "Six years from now, you're not going to see me hanging out in the lobby of the U.N."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,050 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:13 pm
@aaronssongs,
Wow, who would of ever figured dissent was alive and well in this adminitration?
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:20 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34581 wrote:
Wow, who would of ever figured dissent was alive and well in this adminitration?


Why don't you explain to everyone here, your take on dissent, and how it applies to this administration (adminitration, unfortunately for you, is not a word) ? Because, I seriously doubt, you know what it means.
Enlighten us.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:22 pm
@aaronssongs,
Two words. Poetic licence.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:25 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34590 wrote:
Two words. Poetic licence.


I rest my case....some folks can't think their way out of a paper bag.
You just proved it. LOL
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:28 pm
@aaronssongs,
You just proven your thought might comes to a point, not the other way around. For if libs ever got to that point the arguement would be over.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:31 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34597 wrote:
You just proven your thought might comes to a point, not the other way around. For if libs ever got to that point the arguement would be over.


Besides not being able to spell, or articulate a thought....you cannot elaborate on any given topic, because you don't possess the reasoning ability, nor the language skills which are required for debate and discourse....methinks, you're on the wrong site...and hardly equipped to be a moderator.
You embarrass yourself at every turn.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:36 pm
@aaronssongs,
methinks? You forgot to add a space.
Quote:
you're on the wrong site...and hardly equipped to be a moderator.
i resigned just so i could have fun with you a fed. Game on!
Quote:
You embarrass yourself at every turn.
It's ok when your smiling all the way.
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:41 pm
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34604 wrote:
methinks? You forgot to add a space. i resigned just so i could have fun with you a fed. Game on!It's ok when your smiling all the way.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2007 05:44 pm
@aaronssongs,
Only one entry found, must not of been around long. Source?
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 01:17 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34613 wrote:
Only one entry found, must not of been around long. Source?[/QUO
O

One entry is all that is needed....the source is the Merriam-Webster's dictionary, which, surprisingly, one can find online.
0 Replies
 
FedUpAmerican
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 08:36 am
@aaronssongs,
Hear no evil. See no evil. Speak no evil.

Seems like "Big D" is afraid to respond to the OP and only wants to taunt. Shows his MAJOR lack of intelligence.

Now he will NO DOUBT come back with his petty little threats and amusing childlike comments. I have yet to see anything even remotely intelligent come from HIS camp. I have only seen his love affair with his boy toy "pino."

I love how they have pet names for each other.

So I will continue to ignore him and laugh at his ignorance. :rollinglaugh:
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 09:36 am
@FedUpAmerican,
FedUpAmerican;34912 wrote:
Hear no evil. See no evil. Speak no evil.

Seems like "Big D" is afraid to respond to the OP and only wants to taunt. Shows his MAJOR lack of intelligence.

Now he will NO DOUBT come back with his petty little threats and amusing childlike comments. I have yet to see anything even remotely intelligent come from HIS camp. I have only seen his love affair with his boy toy "pino."

I love how they have pet names for each other.

So I will continue to ignore him and laugh at his ignorance. :rollinglaugh:


That's all he ever does, and somehow thinks it adds up to something.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 09:45 am
@FedUpAmerican,
FedUpAmerican;34912 wrote:
Hear no evil. See no evil. Speak no evil.

Seems like "Big D" is afraid to respond to the OP and only wants to taunt. Shows his MAJOR lack of intelligence.

Now he will NO DOUBT come back with his petty little threats and amusing childlike comments. I have yet to see anything even remotely intelligent come from HIS camp. I have only seen his love affair with his boy toy "pino."

I love how they have pet names for each other.

So I will continue to ignore him and laugh at his ignorance. :rollinglaugh:
I see your opposed to Big D having his own opinion? Affraid? not at all, look at my post count.
Quote:
Now he will NO DOUBT come back with his petty little threats and amusing childlike comments.
You know threats are not allowed in this forum, i suggest if you feel threatened you should notify a mod, LOL.
Quote:
I have yet to see anything even remotely intelligent come from HIS camp.
Your fed up, why would you see anything intelligent at all?
Quote:
I have only seen his love affair with his boy toy "pino."
I guess pino is better the penis. Something you seem to lack? Much less the accommodating hardware, LOL?
Quote:
I love how they have pet names for each other.
I've got a good one for you, wanna hear it?
Quote:
So I will continue to ignore him and laugh at his ignorance.
Ignore is all you can handle.
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 09:46 am
@92b16vx,
92b16vx;34944 wrote:
That's all he ever does, and somehow thinks it adds up to something.
Can't get past me, you don't have much of a chance anywhere else.
92b16vx
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 09:57 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34953 wrote:
Can't get past me, you don't have much of a chance anywhere else.


Past you? Sonny, I was past you the day I was born.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 09:59 am
@aaronssongs,
You hit the ground running huh?
0 Replies
 
aaronssongs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 11:55 am
@Drnaline,
Drnaline;34952 wrote:
I see your opposed to Big D having his own opinion? Affraid? not at all, look at my post count.You know threats are not allowed in this forum, i suggest if you feel threatened you should notify a mod, LOL.Your fed up, why would you see anything intelligent at all? I guess pino is better the penis. Something you seem to lack? Much less the accommodating hardware, LOL?I've got a good one for you, wanna hear it?Ignore is all you can handle.


Clever you are not! All you're doing is embarrassing yourself. Can't you have just one intelligent discourse about anything?
And "afraid" has only one "f", I'm afraid. LOL
I really am starting to feel sad for you...it's a sad thing to watch someone self-destruct.
0 Replies
 
Drnaline
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Sep, 2007 05:52 pm
@aaronssongs,
Keep watching baby, you ain't seen nothing yet, it's gonna be slow and agonizing for both of us, LOL.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Book Tells Of Dissent In Bush's Inner Circle
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 11:23:16