1
   

Eve, if God were loving, would have been the mother of Jesus.

 
 
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 12:57 am
Eve, if God were loving, would have been the mother of Jesus.

The Bible would have us believe that a loving God sent a genocidal flood to wipe out most of mankind and then after turning evil again, sent Jesus to forgive.

As a loving parent I forgive completely and immediately.

God, as the epitome of a parent would do the same.

This would mean that Eve would have born Jesus and received forgiveness at that point. The justice of God is swift.

Eve was the sinner and the one in need of forgiveness, No chastisement of many innocents is then required by God and He does not need to break His own law and commandment of not killing humans.

Needless to say that any conflagration between God, as most think of Him, and even modern man, would not be a fair and just encounter, therefore the flood myth is just that, a myth, and is not what a true God would do.

Logically and spiritually, the Bible cannot be seen as advocating genocide. Even if it says God used it.
To think that God would sow many souls and gain only 8 out of millions is to think that God is a poor farmer at best and perhaps crazy to try such a venture again.

We must all pay for our own sins Eve, no different.
To forgive Her is to save God?s reputation as a genocidal maniac.

This makes Eve the most likely person to be the Mother of Jesus and allows for the birth of the trinity.
If not, then how else to explain the Trinity. In the time of Marie, Jesus was yet to be born and could not then be part of the Trinity.

Regards
DL
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 899 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 03:38 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Well, god did put adam and eve in the garden knowing full-well that they were going to eat the fruit, and then punishes them for doing what he knew what they were going to do and was fully capable of preventing....why put the effing tree there in the first place?
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 06:03 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58575 wrote:
Well, god did put adam and eve in the garden knowing full-well that they were going to eat the fruit, and then punishes them for doing what he knew what they were going to do and was fully capable of preventing....why put the effing tree there in the first place?


Because without it we would not have moral sense.

Most do not recognize that Eve did us all a great service by eating of it.

God was pleased.

If you read the fall with an angry tone then you see God chastizing Adam and Eve. If you read it with a more Jesus like aptitude and tone you see God merely coveying information and sending us out to learn what He has given us.

Regards
DL
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 07:53 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58577 wrote:
Because without it we would not have moral sense.

Most do not recognize that Eve did us all a great service by eating of it.

God was pleased.

If you read the fall with an angry tone then you see God chastizing Adam and Eve. If you read it with a more Jesus like aptitude and tone you see God merely coveying information and sending us out to learn what He has given us.

Regards
DL


so he punishes them for doing what he wanted them to do?
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Aug, 2008 12:41 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58578 wrote:
so he punishes them for doing what he wanted them to do?


Is it a punishment to give moral sense to us and then allow us to use it?

Would you be happy with no moral sense?

Regards
DL
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Aug, 2008 07:38 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58582 wrote:
Is it a punishment to give moral sense to us and then allow us to use it?

Would you be happy with no moral sense?

Regards
DL


Is it a punishment to give women birth pains?
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Aug, 2008 01:28 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58583 wrote:
Is it a punishment to give women birth pains?


Birth pain is natural in animals. What else needs to be said. We are animals.

Regards
DL
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Aug, 2008 04:14 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58589 wrote:
Birth pain is natural in animals. What else needs to be said. We are animals.

Regards
DL


You didn't answer the question. Is giving women birth pains a punishment. yes or no?
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Aug, 2008 05:39 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58594 wrote:
You didn't answer the question. Is giving women birth pains a punishment. yes or no?


God did not give birth pain. It is natural for animals. Same as death.

Do you really think God micro manages every little pain known to man?

Regards
DL
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Aug, 2008 07:22 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58598 wrote:
God did not give birth pain. It is natural for animals. Same as death.

Do you really think God micro manages every little pain known to man?

Regards
DL


16 To the woman he said,

?I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
in pain you shall bring forth children.
Your desire shall be for [1] your husband,
and he shall rule over you.?


Gen 3:16
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Aug, 2008 11:14 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58601 wrote:
16 To the woman he said,

?I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
in pain you shall bring forth children.
Your desire shall be for [1] your husband,
and he shall rule over you.?


Gen 3:16


First, no one was around to hear what God told anyone.
Secondly, why punish Eve for doing God's work of giving man moral sense.
Thirdly, my wife walks beside me, not behind me.

All souls have equal value. Why would God place one above another here when the demographic shape of heaven only has two layers. God is 1, All the rest are 2.

Do you believe in the talking snake?

Regards
DL
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2008 04:58 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58602 wrote:
First, no one was around to hear what God told anyone.
Secondly, why punish Eve for doing God's work of giving man moral sense.
Thirdly, my wife walks beside me, not behind me.

All souls have equal value. Why would God place one above another here when the demographic shape of heaven only has two layers. God is 1, All the rest are 2.

Do you believe in the talking snake?

Regards
DL


may i reply....

DUH!

i'm merely pointing out the inconsistencies in the bible.
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2008 05:33 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;58604 wrote:
may i reply....

DUH!

i'm merely pointing out the inconsistencies in the bible.


There are many there.

Probably not bad for a first draft thought. Hope they hurry with a better version.

Regards
DL
0 Replies
 
Greatest I am cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 03:49 am
dattaswami;58790 wrote:
I & Father Are Same, Son Of God, Messenger Of God

To a deserving devotee, Jesus told He and His father are one and the same. When Jesus saw a devotee who was slightly affected by jealousy and egoism, Jesus came down by one step saying that He was the son of the God. The word son is indicating that He is different from the God but the same spirit is present in both like the same blood in the father and the son. This means that He is different and smaller than the God but at the same time has the same essence. It is like the relationship between the mighty ocean and the tiny water drop. The father is major and the son is minor component. They resemble qualitatively but differ quantitatively. This is the visishta advaita of Ramanuja.

When Jesus met a devotee who is fully bacterialised by jealousy and egoism He told that He was the humble messenger of God. This is the Dvaita of Madhva. Therefore the human incarnation will declare its level based on the level of the receiver. Mohammad told that He is the messenger of the Lord. Thus there is a gradual degradation of spiritual obedience and the gradual growth of jealousy and egoism. Jesus stands as a transition bridge between the Advaita of Krishna and Dvaita of Mohammad.

At Thy Lotus Feet His Holiness Sri Dattaswami

Anil Antony

Universal Spirituality
Universal Spirituality for World Peace



OK.

I too am a Son of God.

Regards
DL
dattaswami cv
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 11:37 am
@Greatest I am cv,
Greatest I am;58806 wrote:
OK.

I too am a Son of God.

Regards
DL


Greatest I am;

Meaning of 'Son of God' as told by Jesus

Jesus claimed Himself as the son of God. In fact any human incarnation is son of God. If the human incarnations are sons of God, what about the other human beings in the creation? They are daughters of God. What is the difference and similarity between son and daughter? The similarity is that both son and daughter are the issues of father and mother. Similarly the human incarnation and the human being have the same parents and similar birth. The difference between son and daughter is that the son is a male like the father and the daughter is a female like the mother. Here God is the divine father. The power of God which is in the form of creation (Prakruti) is the divine mother. Thus the human incarnation and the human being are created by the will of God and by the body given by the mother.

Therefore the human incarnation and the human being have the same human bodies with the same five elements. The will of the God is the sperm of the Father that entered the womb of the mother secretly. Gita says the same (Tasmin Garbham Dadhamyaham). It appears as if the mother has delivered the child because the union of the Father with mother is a secret. Similarly, it appears as if the children are produced from parents, who constitute the divine mother (Prakruti) only. Without the will of God, the child cannot be born and the will of God is secret.

Now the human being is a replica of the mother. This means that the human being consists of the structure of the mother only in toto. The structure of the Father is not seen in the daughter. The awareness (soul) is a part of the creation (Prakruti) only and is called as Paraprakruti (Prakrutim Viddhi Me Param - Gita). The external body and the subtle body (Gunas or Antahkaranams) constitute another part of creation called as Aparaprakruti). In fact the awareness itself is another Antaharanam called as Chittam that stores the knowledge. In the Aparapraruti, only three Antahkaranams are told in Gita. Therefore Chittam, the awareness storing the knowledge must be Paraprakruti. Therefore the human being is just a photograph or duplicate of the Prakruti or Mother.

If you analyze the son, the body of the son is also from the womb of the same mother but it contains an extra item that is the male structure of the Father. Similarly in the human incarnation, all the items of the human being (which are categorized as Para and Apara) exist with an additional item which is God (The Divine Father). The son is a human body like the daughter from the womb of the mother but has extra structure of the Father. Similarly the human incarnation is a human being and God joined together. This extra structure of God does not exist in all the human beings. This is the meaning of the ?son of God? as told by Jesus.

Similarly Krishna is the human incarnation having the contribution from both the mother and Father. He refers to the aspect of God (Ajopisan?.) and also to the aspect of Mother (Prakrutim svam?.). Thus human incarnation is two in one system. Generally, He acts like His sisters in respecting the mother by following all the rules of nature only. Only in a rare occasion, He behaves like the father and controls the mother for which the mother will not mistake.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Eve, if God were loving, would have been the mother of Jesus.
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/09/2026 at 09:34:22