@rugonnacry,
How about Acts 3
The topic of Biblical canon is very interesting to me as the Bible itself from what we know of it through archeology is very troubling.
The earliest Gospel of Jesus is Mark and it's dated to 125CE, almost 100 years after the Crucifixion. This tells you that (if it is from 125CE, and it was) it could not have been written by Mark as he was a grown man by 30CE. Even if it was his oral tradition first scribed in 125CE only 40-60% of the original story would have remained by the standards of accuracy in oral tradition at that time (as per a man with a PHD in Biblical Studies interviewed by Lee Strobel). The interesting thing about the 125CE version of mark is that it stops at chapter 18, it doesn't tell of a resurrection. Only later, after the other gospels are discovered (between 150-170CE) do we find a copy of this gospel which tells of a resurrection.
acts 3 was written around 175CE, and is very much in the same style
as with anything else in life always question those who caution you against free thought.