@Serious Outlook,
Serious Outlook;5153 wrote:I am not sure as to whether I am suppose to address your reply with the regard you could be foreign/reign from another region of the world or if is that you are intellectually challenged!
You write...
Despite the grammatical misuse and the lack of coherent sentences, I am not sure this is worthy of the time it takes to depict or discern what you are seeking in your so called question or if your statement warrants any merit or credit worthiness.
However, I will submit to such and offer this.
1. I am allowed to post because quite simply it is a public forum
2. Why would I not post on a political forum when the basis for the topic so heavily weighs on politics and when I chose the correct grouping for my thread
Your second question of equal submission...
..is answered by informing you that this is not a disclaimer but rather a mere depiction in words of a disclaimer where the title of the thread is included. This you should learn is a style of writing carried by many writers and/or authors.
Your other comments deserve nothing in return as you obviously did not read or have the ability to retain the material for which you had just read. As in your other replies/comments of my threads you apparently can't comprehend the information provided or again failed to read in entirety before providing feedback.
Had you done so, then neither of us would be wasting time to post our replies to one another. I am guilty of doing more than what I should by acknowledging you at all. I can't resist however, because of the blatant stupidity offered up by you.
Quote:I am not sure as to whether I am suppose to address your reply with the regard you could be foreign/reign from another region of the world or if is that you are intellectually challenged!
Me being foreign would change your answer how? And how would it change if i were intellectually challenged?
Quote:Despite the grammatical misuse and the lack of coherent sentences, I am not sure this is worthy of the time it takes to depict or discern what you are seeking in your so called question or if your statement warrants any merit or credit worthiness.
I read over your post and i found mistakes, surely your not saying your perfect are you? In any case no one is forcing you to reply. This is an informal site with corospondence between persons of an unofficial capasity. In other words, how many people do you correct when they pronounce a word wrong in polite conversation when your talking person to person? Or use a word out of context? Do you normally use character assasination as a means to get your point accross?
Quote:However, I will submit to such and offer this.
1. I am allowed to post because quite simply it is a public forum
2. Why would I not post on a political forum when the basis for the topic so heavily weighs on politics and when I chose the correct grouping for my thread
1. So would you allow a rabi or a priest to post a contradiction to your opinion? Because from what i read, you don't think they deserve an opinion or should be held as not to speak of it in public or behind the pulpit?
2. What i get from this is you see it as your right to post on a free internet system but would choose to not give certain individuals that same voice. Because of there devotion to a religous doctrine and happening to be a leader in there chosen faith? I didn't say anything was wrong with your thread grouping.
Quote:Your second question of equal submission....is answered by informing you that this is not a disclaimer but rather a mere depiction in words of a disclaimer where the title of the thread is included. This you should learn is a style of writing carried by many writers and/or authors.
"but rather a mere depiction in words of a disclaimer where the title of the thread is included."
Like a said, a disclaimer. Excuse my ignorance, you would be the first writer/author we have had here if that's what your implying?
Quote:Your other comments deserve nothing in return as you obviously did not read or have the ability to retain the material for which you had just read.
Reading and retaining is required by you to reply to one of your posts, first i heard of that one. FYI i read the whole thing. I understand your point. I choose to disagree with you. Funny you equate that to reading/retaining issues.
Quote:As in your other replies/comments of my threads you apparently can't comprehend the information provided or again failed to read in entirety before providing feedback.
Wrong again. Why would i try to retain anything that comes with a disclaimer the reads "My statements andthe information provided here in are neither fact or religion." You want me to take this seriously why you yourself state it is not fact? Got a high opinion of your self it sounds like.
Quote:Had you done so, then neither of us would be wasting time to post our replies to one another. I am guilty of doing more than what I should by acknowledging you at all. I can't resist however, because of the blatant stupidity offered up by you.
You should of put your disclaimer on top so i might of had the choice of knowing before going through the motions of reading what you wrote was by your own words Non-fiction. So it appears to me you were the first to waist someones time. "I am guilty of doing more than what I should by acknowledging you at all." I guess i can say the same thing about you
Quote:I can't resist however, because of the blatant stupidity offered up by you.
Blatant, i suppose you can prove that? With somthing other then opinion. Have you always had such a low resistance to resist? Do you have the same resistance to temptation? Your a perfect example for openminded tolerance, Not!