Why they let us believe....

Seems to me both senarios are hearsay?

I've pondered this as well.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. If Jesus had a wife, it wouldn't change my faith in God, nor would it change the faith of most true Christians. He's still God, but like most of these conspiracy theorists claim, these are both unproven accusations.

Don't change my mind for sure.

It just makes me wonder why the church feels the need to mislead its followers about it if Jesus did in fact have a wife.

And what about potential children?

Well that's the thing...there's no real proof of it. There are some documents out there that say Jesus was married, there are the Gnostic Gospels, and there's the Book of Judas. The Old and New Testaments and the Apocrypha have simply been used for many more years than the other documents, and they determine what I believe. If I'm wrong about it, then I'll find out when I die.

As far as potential children go, I think The DaVinci Code movie put it best when Tom Hank's character reminds Sophie that a child of Jesus wouldn't want to ruin the church or Jesus' work. I honestly don't believe He had children, but as I said, I'll know when it's too late to make a difference.

Why does this crocodile keep popping up in every other post? Anyway Jesus was not married, was not gay, did not fake his own death on the cross, did not live in Kashmere, did not father Peter, nor was he Peter's son. It's funny how people will not believe a book that has been scrutinized for 2000 years yet will believe any book that pops up with "new" revelations.