@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
removal of the Jews could very well turn out to be the final solution, I am sure that the global superpower of the new age, China, will support that approach. No doubt Israel has been supplying China with arms over US objections in the attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Chinese, but they forget that the Chinese tend to be ruthlessly practical. Long term Israel has nothing to offer China, the Arabs and Persians do.
Quote:it is pretty clear to me that the Jews are counting on sympathy for an ancient event to allow them to do whatever they want to do. However, the final solution was a very long time ago, and I think a lot of us are darn tired of that get out of jail card being played. No one would support killing Jews. However, killing the state of Israel, and making life such that the Jews would volunteer to relocate has a good likelihood of coming to pass.
The victim has become the abuser, and we Americans have become enablers of the abuse of the Palestinians. At some point we are going to look at ourselves in the mirror and decide that we need to do something different.
The first sentence of your post is pretty outrageous.
Were you intending to be provocative by using the term "final solution" or are you just that tone deaf?
I'm relieved to see that in your second post you do not support killing Jews, but this assurance only makes the vacuity of your prediction that much more stunning.
In what possible manner can the evacuation of all Jews from Israel be accomplished without the deaths of millions of Jews?
The Chinese may be ruthlessly practical but they are not so efficient or ingenious as to be able to pull off this stunt without considerable death or destruction.
What non-violent action will persuade the Jews to voluntarily remove themselves from Israel?
If the Israelis are counting on sympathy for the incredible suffering of Jews under Nazi Germany, they are drinking from a dry well.
There is not a legion of nations supporting Israel in the first place, but which ones are primarily driven by the Holocaust to do so?
As for the Holocaust being an "ancient" event too far removed to reasonably move men's hearts and minds, you realize, don't you, that there are still living survivors of the Nazi death camps, and a very large percentage of Israelis who have relatives who were killed during the period --- not to mention friends and relatives who were injured or killed in wars and terrorist attacks,
since WWII, intended to accomplish your suggested "final solution."
It really doesn't matter whether the rest of the world sympathizes with the Jews because of what you call an "ancient event." Israeli Jews understand quite well the sad history of their people and, irrespective of their personal political and religious views are both united and galvanized by the oath "Never again!"
By your logic, if the Israelis are somehow able to remain a nation and not be accused of oppression against Palestinians (never mind genocide), the statute of limitations of Palestinian grievances will run in about 50 or so years. Right?
The primary problem with this ridiculous notion is that unless and until the Israelis depart Israel, the Palestinians will always claim grievance.
No matter what your opinion may be on the conduct of Israel as respects Palestinians, the idea of a final solution that encompasses the "removal" of Jews from Israel is either incredibly stupid or disgusting.
