@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:This surprising history behind the 1950s British tv series, starring Richard Greene
(did he ever do anything else?) and a very 1950s style beauty as Maid Marion appeared in Salon.com:
Though not without flashes of excitement or, more rarely, political insight, the Robin Hood movies that followed in the next 20 years were stylistically unambitious. But then came clean-cut Richard Greene in TV's "The Adventures of Robin Hood" (1955-58). This remarkable show, which ran for 143 episodes, was produced by a British-based company funded by the CPUSA to provide clandestine work for blacklisted Hollywood screenwriters.
I am certainly
taken aback to hear an allegation
that the Richard Greene series was a
communist product.
Quote:Among the 22 who contributed were Ring Lardner Jr., Ian McLellan Hunter, Robert Lees and Waldo Salt, who, working for producer Hannah Weinstein, a "silent" left-wing organizer, sent their scripts pseudonymously from America.
We certainly had
no idea that any
commies nor pinko fellow travellers
were involved in those innocuous little stories of the fictional Robin Hood,
which were primarily devoted to the abusive usurpation of King John
of the throne of his brother, King Richard the Lion Hearted,
who was away in the Crusades.
Quote:The socialistic stories,
I
dispute that thay were
socialistic. If thay had been,
we 'd have taken a different philosopny qua our viewing habits.
I did
not support commies nor nazis.
Maybe some picket signs woud have been in order.
Quote:often based on historical laws and customs, revolved around Robin's
efforts to protect the heavily taxed serfs and teach the well-born lessons in humanism.
The problems sought to be addressed were clear, simple and non-controversial.
I do not remember any communist propaganda in those scripts.
Quote:Not only did the series suggest support for the British welfare state,
I
dispute that thay
DID.
Quote:it created offshore opportunities for its American writers.
That 's a shame.
Quote:As Tom Dewe Mathews noted in the Guardian: "Lardner explained that a TV show about an outlaw who takes from the rich to give to the poor provided him 'with plenty of opportunities to comment on issues and institutions in Eisenhower-era America.'"
As I remember, that did not happen. This commentary is deceitful.
Quote:Mathews cites blacklist scholar Steve Neale's discovery that "within the scripts' emphasis on redistribution of wealth there is 'a theme that recurs in the first two series: the probability that Robin Hood or one of the outlaws will be betrayed,'" like the writers themselves.
Nazis and commies
DESERVE to be betrayed.
That is an act of self defense from their intended victims.
David